Suppr超能文献

[低剂量率近距离放射治疗局限性前列腺癌的长期评估]

[Long-term evaluation of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in localized prostate cancer].

作者信息

Carl N, Rassweiler J, Andreas J, Carl S

机构信息

Klinik für Urologie und Urochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland.

ehem. Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, SLK-Kliniken Heilbronn, Heilbronn, Deutschland.

出版信息

Urologie. 2023 Oct;62(10):1057-1063. doi: 10.1007/s00120-023-02099-0. Epub 2023 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

As a result of technical innovation, i.e., improvement of seed quality, implantation method, and dose calculation, it has been possible to continuously improve oncological results in the treatment of localized prostate cancer with low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT). Randomized controlled trials have shown that there is no significant difference in oncological control between the use of radical prostatectomy and LDR-BT in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. The objective of this study was to investigate the oncological efficacy of LDR-BT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective multicenter analysis was conducted on 618 patients treated with LDR-BT as monotherapy, who received a dose of 145 Gy. We used iodine as the radioactive source. The analysis was conducted with follow-up data from two brachytherapy centers in Germany between 2004 and 2019. The primary endpoint was biochemical relapse-free survival (bRFS), whereby the Phoenix definition (PSA - nadir +2 ng/ml; PSA: prostate-specific antigen) was used to define biochemical relapse, i.e., therapeutic failure.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 52 months (range 3-180 months). The bRFS across all risk groups was 87.87%. Oncological efficacy was significantly higher in patients with a Gleason score of 6 and 7a (p-value < 0.0001); however, there was no significant difference in bRFS between these two groups. Bilateral tumor infiltration or prostate volume had no significant influence on bRFS.

CONCLUSION

Our results show no difference in bRFS between Gleason score 6 and 7a.

摘要

背景与目的

由于技术创新,即种子质量、植入方法和剂量计算的改进,采用低剂量率近距离放射治疗(LDR - BT)治疗局限性前列腺癌的肿瘤学效果得以持续改善。随机对照试验表明,低风险前列腺癌患者使用根治性前列腺切除术和LDR - BT在肿瘤学控制方面无显著差异。本研究的目的是调查LDR - BT的肿瘤学疗效。

材料与方法

对618例接受LDR - BT单药治疗且剂量为145 Gy的患者进行回顾性多中心分析。我们使用碘作为放射源。分析采用德国两个近距离放射治疗中心2004年至2019年的随访数据。主要终点是无生化复发生存期(bRFS),采用凤凰定义(前列腺特异性抗原[PSA] - 最低点 +2 ng/ml;PSA:前列腺特异性抗原)来定义生化复发,即治疗失败。

结果

中位随访时间为52个月(范围3 - 180个月)。所有风险组的bRFS为87.87%。Gleason评分为6和7a的患者肿瘤学疗效显著更高(p值<0.0001);然而,这两组之间的bRFS无显著差异。双侧肿瘤浸润或前列腺体积对bRFS无显著影响。

结论

我们的结果显示Gleason评分6和7a之间的bRFS无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a77/10567920/1b7488899c25/120_2023_2099_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验