Le Hanneur Malo, Bouché Pierre-Alban, Vignes Jean-Luc, Poitevin Nathalie, Legagneux Josette, Fitoussi Franck
From the Microsurgery Training and Research Laboratory, Paris School of Surgery.
Hand to Shoulder Mediterranean Center, ELSAN.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Apr 1;153(4):853-860. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010755. Epub 2023 May 24.
Ethical and financial considerations have encouraged the use of nonliving models for simulation-based training in microsurgery, such as commercially available chicken thighs. The purpose of this study was to compare the nonliving chicken thigh model to the one currently considered as the standard-namely, the living rat model-in the setting of an initiation microsurgery course.
Applicants to the 3-day basic microsurgery course of the Paris School of Surgery were assigned randomly to either one group that received the regular training of the school (RT group), including four hands-on sessions using only living rat models, or one group that received a modified curriculum in which a nonliving chicken thigh model was used for the first hands-on session (CT group). During the following session, all trainees were evaluated on living rat models, using a global rating scale and two task-specific scales (knot-tying and anastomosis); rates of anastomosis patency, animal survival, and technique completion were recorded.
Ninety-three residents were enrolled. Global rating scale, knot-tying, and anastomosis task-specific scale scores were significantly higher in the CT group ( n = 51) than in the RT group, with mean differences of 2.6 points ( P = 0.0001), 1.3 points ( P < 0.0001), and 1.4 points ( P < 0.0001), respectively. Patency and survival rates were significantly higher in the CT group than in the RT group, with mean differences of 22% ( P = 0.0020) and 27% ( P < 0.0001), respectively; completion rates were not statistically different.
Subject to the use of validated models, such as the chicken thigh, nonliving animal models are a suitable alternative to the living rat model in microsurgery initial training.
The use of validated non-living models, such as the chicken thigh, is a suitable alternative to the living rat model in microsurgery initial training.
伦理和经济方面的考量促使人们在显微外科模拟训练中使用非活体模型,如市售的鸡大腿。本研究的目的是在显微外科入门课程中,将非活体鸡大腿模型与目前被视为标准的活体大鼠模型进行比较。
巴黎外科学校为期3天的基础显微外科课程的申请者被随机分配到两组,一组接受学校的常规培训(RT组),包括仅使用活体大鼠模型进行四次实践操作课程;另一组接受修改后的课程,其中在第一次实践操作课程中使用非活体鸡大腿模型(CT组)。在接下来的课程中,所有学员都在活体大鼠模型上接受评估,使用整体评分量表和两个特定任务量表(打结和吻合);记录吻合通畅率、动物存活率和技术完成率。
93名住院医师参与研究。CT组(n = 51)的整体评分量表、打结和吻合特定任务量表得分显著高于RT组,平均差异分别为2.6分(P = 0.0001)、1.3分(P < 0.0001)和1.4分(P < 0.0001)。CT组的通畅率和存活率显著高于RT组,平均差异分别为22%(P = 0.0020)和27%(P < 0.0001);完成率无统计学差异。
在使用经过验证的模型(如鸡大腿)的情况下,非活体动物模型是显微外科初始训练中活体大鼠模型的合适替代方案。
在显微外科初始训练中,使用经过验证的非活体模型(如鸡大腿)是活体大鼠模型的合适替代方案。