Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC,Australia.
Victorian Institute of Sport, Melbourne, VIC,Australia.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2023 Jun 1;18(7):686-694. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2022-0351. Print 2023 Jul 1.
PURPOSE: To examine the effects of a high-carbohydrate diet (HCHO), periodized-carbohydrate (CHO) diet (PCHO), and ketogenic low-CHO high-fat diet (LCHF) on training capacity. METHODS: Elite male racewalkers completed 3 weeks of periodic training while adhering to their dietary intervention. Twenty-nine data sets were collected from 21 athletes. Each week, 6 mandatory training sessions were completed, with additional sessions performed at the athlete's discretion. Mandatory sessions included an interval session (10 × 1-km efforts on a 6-min cycle), tempo session (14 km with a 450-m elevation gain), 2 long walks (25-40 km), and 2 easy walks (8-12 km) where "sleep-low" and "train-low" dietary strategies were employed for PCHO. Racewalking speed, heart rate, rating of perceived exhaustion, and blood metabolites were collected around key sessions. RESULTS: LCHF covered less total distance than HCHO and PCHO (P < .001); however, no differences in training load between groups were evident (P = .285). During the interval sessions, walking speed was slower in LCHF (P = .001), equating to a 2.8% and 5.6% faster speed in HCHO and PCHO, respectively. LCHF was also 3.2% slower in completing the tempo session than HCHO and PCHO (P = .001). Heart rate was higher (P = .002) and lactate concentrations were lower (P < .001) in LCHF compared to other groups, despite slower walking speeds during the interval session. No between-groups differences in rating of perceived exhaustion were evident (P = .077). CONCLUSION: Athletes adhering to an LCHF diet showed impaired training capacity relative to their high-CHO-supported counterparts, completing lower training volumes at slower speeds, with higher heart rates.
目的:研究高碳水化合物饮食(HCHO)、周期性碳水化合物(CHO)饮食(PCHO)和生酮低碳水化合物高脂肪饮食(LCHF)对训练能力的影响。
方法:精英男性竞走运动员在进行周期性训练的同时完成 3 周的饮食干预。从 21 名运动员中收集了 29 组数据。每周完成 6 次强制性训练课程,此外运动员还可根据自己的意愿进行额外训练。强制性课程包括间歇课程(在 6 分钟的自行车上进行 10×1 公里的努力)、节奏课程(14 公里,海拔上升 450 米)、2 次长距离步行(25-40 公里)和 2 次轻松步行(8-12 公里),其中 PCHO 采用“睡眠低”和“训练低”的饮食策略。在关键课程周围收集竞走速度、心率、感知疲劳程度和血液代谢物。
结果:与 HCHO 和 PCHO 相比,LCHF 的总距离较短(P<.001);然而,各组之间的训练负荷没有明显差异(P=.285)。在间歇课程中,LCHF 的行走速度较慢(P=.001),相当于 HCHO 和 PCHO 的速度分别快 2.8%和 5.6%。与 HCHO 和 PCHO 相比,LCHF 完成节奏课程的速度也慢了 3.2%(P=.001)。与其他组相比,LCHF 的心率更高(P=.002),乳酸浓度更低(P<.001),尽管在间歇课程中行走速度较慢。在感知疲劳程度方面,各组之间没有差异(P=.077)。
结论:与高碳水化合物支持的对照组相比,遵循 LCHF 饮食的运动员表现出训练能力受损,完成的训练量较低,速度较慢,心率较高。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2023-7-1
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019-3