Wang Yu, Guo Wenyu, Li Zhaoqing, Wu Yansheng, Jing Chao, Ren Yu, Zhao Minghui, Kong Lingping, Zhang Chao, Dong Jiabin, Shuang Yu, Sun Shanshan, Chen Jinliang, Wu Chuanqiang, Qiao Yu, Qu Xin, Wang Xudong, Zhang Lun, Jin Rui, Zhou Xuan
Department of Maxillofacial and Otorhinolaryngological Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Cancer Institute; National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin 300060, P.R. China.
Research Center of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, P.R. China.
Int J Oncol. 2023 Jul;63(1). doi: 10.3892/ijo.2023.5528. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
Following the publication of the above article, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, in Figs. 7A and 8A. apparently the same mouse had been featured to represent two different experimental groups, albeit displaying distinct fluorescence values. Moreover, following an independent investigation in the Editorial Office, an additional instance of probable data duplication was also noted, comparing between the 'SCC15 / si‑NC' cell migration image in Fig. 2D and the 'SCC15‑EV' migration assay image in Fig. 1C. After having consulted their original data, the authors realized that these errors arose during the process of assembling the images for Figs. 2 and 8. First, the image for the DZNep (42d) experiment in Fig. 7A had inadvertently been used for the mimic NC (7d) experiment in Fig. 8A; moreover, the 'SCC15 / si‑NC' cell migration image in Fig. 2D had been selected incorrectly. The revised versions of Figs. 2 and 8, showing the correct data for the the 'SCC15 / si‑NC' cell migration image in Fig. 2D and the mimic NC (7d) experiment in Fig. 8A, are shown on the next two pages. The authors regret that these errors went unnoticed prior to publication, and thank the Editor of for allowing them the opportunity to publish this corrigendum. All the authors agree with the publication of this corrigendum; furthermore, they also apologize to the readership of the journal for any inconvenience caused. [International Journal of Oncology 52: 1149‑1164, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4293].
上述文章发表后,一位感兴趣的读者提请作者注意,在图7A和8A中,显然同一只小鼠被用来代表两个不同的实验组,尽管显示出不同的荧光值。此外,编辑部进行独立调查后,还发现了另一个可能的数据重复实例,即比较图2D中的“SCC15 / si-NC”细胞迁移图像和图1C中的“SCC15-EV”迁移测定图像。作者查阅原始数据后意识到,这些错误是在组装图2和图8的图像过程中出现的。首先,图7A中DZNep(42天)实验的图像被无意中用于图8A中的模拟NC(7天)实验;此外,图2D中“SCC15 / si-NC”细胞迁移图像的选择有误。图2和图8的修订版显示了图2D中“SCC15 / si-NC”细胞迁移图像和图8A中模拟NC(7天)实验的正确数据,见接下来的两页。作者对这些错误在发表前未被发现表示遗憾,并感谢编辑给予他们发表这份勘误的机会。所有作者都同意发表这份勘误;此外,他们也就所造成的任何不便向该期刊的读者道歉。[《国际肿瘤学杂志》52: 1149-1164, 2018; DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4293]