Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
JAMA. 2023 Jun 13;329(22):1924-1933. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.7843.
In patients with cancer who have venous thromboembolism (VTE) events, long-term anticoagulation with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is recommended to prevent recurrent VTE. The effectiveness of a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) compared with LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE in patients with cancer is uncertain.
To evaluate DOACs, compared with LMWH, for preventing recurrent VTE and for rates of bleeding in patients with cancer following an initial VTE event.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Unblinded, comparative effectiveness, noninferiority randomized clinical trial conducted at 67 oncology practices in the US that enrolled 671 patients with cancer (any invasive solid tumor, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia) who had a new clinical or radiological diagnosis of VTE. Enrollment occurred from December 2016 to April 2020. Final follow-up was in November 2020.
Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either a DOAC (n = 335) or LMWH (n = 336) and were followed up for 6 months or until death. Physicians and patients selected any DOAC or any LMWH (or fondaparinux) and physicians selected drug doses.
The primary outcome was the recurrent VTE rate at 6 months. Noninferiority of anticoagulation with a DOAC vs LMWH was defined by the upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI for the difference of a DOAC relative to LMWH of less than 3% in the randomized cohort that received at least 1 dose of assigned treatment. The 6 prespecified secondary outcomes included major bleeding, which was assessed using a 2.5% noninferiority margin.
Between December 2016 and April 2020, 671 participants were randomized and 638 (95%) completed the trial (median age, 64 years; 353 women [55%]). Among those randomized to a DOAC, 330 received at least 1 dose. Among those randomized to LMWH, 308 received at least 1 dose. Rates of recurrent VTE were 6.1% in the DOAC group and 8.8% in the LMWH group (difference, -2.7%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 0.7%) consistent with the prespecified noninferiority criterion. Of 6 prespecified secondary outcomes, none were statistically significant. Major bleeding occurred in 5.2% of participants in the DOAC group and 5.6% in the LMWH group (difference, -0.4%; 1-sided 95% CI, -100% to 2.5%) and did not meet the noninferiority criterion. Severe adverse events occurred in 33.8% of participants in the DOAC group and 35.1% in the LMWH group. The most common serious adverse events were anemia and death.
Among adults with cancer and VTE, DOACs were noninferior to LMWH for preventing recurrent VTE over 6-month follow-up. These findings support use of a DOAC to prevent recurrent VTE in patients with cancer.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02744092.
对于患有静脉血栓栓塞症 (VTE) 事件的癌症患者,建议使用低分子肝素 (LMWH) 进行长期抗凝治疗,以预防复发性 VTE。与 LMWH 相比,直接口服抗凝剂 (DOAC) 预防癌症患者复发性 VTE 的有效性尚不确定。
评估 DOAC 与 LMWH 相比,在预防癌症患者初次 VTE 后复发性 VTE 和出血率方面的效果。
设计、设置和参与者:这是在美国 67 家肿瘤学实践中进行的一项非盲、比较有效性、非劣效性随机临床试验,共纳入 671 例患有癌症(任何侵袭性实体瘤、淋巴瘤、多发性骨髓瘤或慢性淋巴细胞白血病)的患者,这些患者有新的临床或放射学诊断 VTE。招募工作于 2016 年 12 月至 2020 年 4 月进行,最终随访于 2020 年 11 月进行。
参与者以 1:1 的比例随机分为 DOAC 组(n = 335)或 LMWH 组(n = 336),随访 6 个月或直至死亡。医生和患者选择任何 DOAC 或任何 LMWH(或磺达肝素),医生选择药物剂量。
主要结局是 6 个月时复发性 VTE 率。与 LMWH 相比,DOAC 抗凝的非劣效性定义为随机接受至少 1 剂指定治疗的队列中 DOAC 相对于 LMWH 的差异上限,单侧 95%CI 小于 3%。6 个预先指定的次要结局包括大出血,使用 2.5%的非劣效性边界进行评估。
2016 年 12 月至 2020 年 4 月,671 名参与者被随机分组,638 名(95%)完成了试验(中位年龄 64 岁,353 名女性[55%])。在随机接受 DOAC 的患者中,有 330 名患者接受了至少 1 剂。在随机接受 LMWH 的患者中,有 308 名患者接受了至少 1 剂。DOAC 组的复发性 VTE 率为 6.1%,LMWH 组为 8.8%(差异,-2.7%;单侧 95%CI,-100%至 0.7%),符合预设的非劣效性标准。在 6 个预先指定的次要结局中,没有一个具有统计学意义。DOAC 组有 5.2%的参与者发生大出血,LMWH 组有 5.6%(差异,-0.4%;单侧 95%CI,-100%至 2.5%),不符合非劣效性标准。在 DOAC 组有 33.8%的参与者和 LMWH 组有 35.1%的参与者发生严重不良事件。最常见的严重不良事件是贫血和死亡。
在患有癌症和 VTE 的成年人中,DOAC 与 LMWH 相比,在 6 个月的随访中预防复发性 VTE 的效果非劣效。这些发现支持使用 DOAC 预防癌症患者的复发性 VTE。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02744092。