The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Vehicle Research and Test Center, East Liberty, Ohio.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2023;24(sup1):S47-S54. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2023.2167490.
One potential nonstandard seating configuration for vehicles with automated driving systems (ADS) is a reclined seat that is rear-facing when in a frontal collision. There are limited biomechanical response and injury data for this seating configuration during high-speed collisions. The main objective of this study was to investigate thoracic biomechanical responses and injuries to male postmortem human subjects (PMHS) in a rear-facing scenario with varying boundary conditions. Fourteen rear-facing male PMHS tests (10 previously published and 4 newly tested) were conducted at two different recline angles (25-degree and 45-degree) in 56 km/h frontal impacts. PMHS were seated in two different seats; one used a Fixed D-Ring (FDR) seat belt assembly and one used an All Belts To Seat (ABTS) restraint. For thoracic instrumentation, strain gages were attached to ribs to quantify strain and fracture timing. A chestband was installed at the mid-sternum level to quantify anterior-posterior (AP) chest deflections. Data from the thorax instrumentation were analyzed to investigate injury mechanisms. The PMHS sustained a greater number of rib fractures (NRF) in the 45-degree recline condition (12 ± 7 NRF for ABTS45 and 25 ± 18 NRF for FDR45) than the 25-degree condition (6 ± 4 NRF for ABTS25 and 12 ± 8 NRF for FDR25), despite AP chest compressions in the 45-degree condition (-23.7 ± 9.4 mm for ABTS45 and -39.6 ± 11.9 mm for FDR45) being smaller than the 25-degree condition (-38.9 ± 16.9 mm for ABTS25 and -55.0 ± 4.4 mm for FDR25). The rib fractures from the ABTS condition were not as symmetric as the FDR condition in the 25-degree recline angle due to a belt retractor structure located at one side of the seatback frame. Average peak AP chest compression occurred at 45.7 ± 3.4 ms for ABTS45, 45.6 ± 3.1 ms for FDR45, 46.7 ± 1.9 ms for ABTS25, and 46.9 ± 2.3 ms for FDR25. Average peak seatback resultant force occurred at 43.9 ± 0.9 ms for ABTS45, 44.6 ± 0.8 ms for FDR45, 42.5 ± 0.2 ms for ABTS25, and 41.5 ± 0.5 ms for FDR25. The majority of rib fractures occurred after peak AP chest compression and peak seatback resultant force likely due to the ramping motion of the PMHS, which might create a combined loading (e.g., AP deflection and upward deflection) to the thorax. Although NRF in the 45-degree reclined condition was greater than the 25-degree recline condition, similar magnitudes of rib strains were observed regardless of seat and restraint types, while strain modes varied. The majority of rib fractures occurred after peak AP chest compression and peak seatback force, especially in FDR25, ABTS45, and FDR45, while the PMHS ramped up along the seatback. AP chest compression, seatback load, and strain measured along the rib could not explain the greater NRF in the 45-degree recline conditions. A complex combination of AP chest deflection with upward deflection was discovered as a possible mechanism for rib fractures in PMHS subjected to rear-facing frontal impacts in this study.
一种用于具有自动驾驶系统(ADS)的车辆的潜在非标准座椅配置是在正面碰撞时向后倾斜的座椅。在高速碰撞中,这种座椅配置的生物力学响应和损伤数据有限。本研究的主要目的是研究男性尸体(PMHS)在不同边界条件下后向场景中的胸部生物力学响应和损伤。在两种不同的倾斜角度(25 度和 45 度)下,进行了 14 次后向男性 PMHS 测试(10 次先前发表的测试和 4 次新测试),碰撞速度为 56km/h。PMHS 被安置在两种不同的座椅上;一种使用固定 D 型环(FDR)安全带组件,另一种使用全带固定座椅(ABTS)约束装置。对于胸部仪器,应变计贴在肋骨上,以量化应变和骨折时间。在胸骨中部安装了一个胸带,以量化前向和后向(AP)胸部挠度。对胸部仪器的数据进行分析,以研究损伤机制。PMHS 在 45 度倾斜条件下(ABTS45 为 12±7 根肋骨骨折,FDR45 为 25±18 根肋骨骨折)比 25 度倾斜条件(ABTS25 为 6±4 根肋骨骨折,FDR25 为 12±8 根肋骨骨折)遭受了更多的肋骨骨折(NRF),尽管 45 度倾斜条件下的 AP 胸部压缩(ABTS45 为-23.7±9.4mm,FDR45 为-39.6±11.9mm)小于 25 度倾斜条件(ABTS25 为-38.9±16.9mm,FDR25 为-55.0±4.4mm)。ABTS 条件下的肋骨骨折不像 FDR 条件下那样对称,因为座椅靠背框架一侧有一个安全带收卷器结构。ABTS45 的平均峰值 AP 胸部压缩发生在 45.7±3.4ms,FDR45 的平均峰值 AP 胸部压缩发生在 45.6±3.1ms,ABTS25 的平均峰值 AP 胸部压缩发生在 46.7±1.9ms,FDR25 的平均峰值 AP 胸部压缩发生在 46.9±2.3ms。ABTS45 的平均峰值座椅靠背合力发生在 43.9±0.9ms,FDR45 的平均峰值座椅靠背合力发生在 44.6±0.8ms,ABTS25 的平均峰值座椅靠背合力发生在 42.5±0.2ms,FDR25 的平均峰值座椅靠背合力发生在 41.5±0.5ms。大多数肋骨骨折发生在峰值 AP 胸部压缩和峰值座椅靠背合力之后,这可能是由于 PMHS 的斜坡运动,这可能会对胸部造成组合加载(例如,AP 挠度和向上挠度)。尽管 45 度倾斜条件下的 NRF 大于 25 度倾斜条件,但无论座椅和约束类型如何,观察到相似的肋骨应变幅度,而应变模式有所不同。大多数肋骨骨折发生在峰值 AP 胸部压缩和峰值座椅靠背力之后,尤其是在 FDR25、ABTS45 和 FDR45 中,而 PMHS 沿着座椅靠背向上移动。AP 胸部压缩、座椅靠背负载和沿着肋骨测量的应变不能解释 45 度倾斜条件下更大的 NRF。本研究发现,在 PMHS 后向正面碰撞中,AP 胸部挠度与向上挠度的复杂组合可能是肋骨骨折的一个可能机制。