Department of Biology, West Virginia University, 53 Campus Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Curr Genet. 2023 Dec;69(4-6):203-212. doi: 10.1007/s00294-023-01272-4. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
First marketed as RoundUp, glyphosate is history's most popular herbicide because of its low acute toxicity to metazoans and broad-spectrum effectiveness across plant species. The development of glyphosate-resistant crops has led to increased glyphosate use and consequences from the use of glyphosate-based herbicides (GBH). Glyphosate has entered the food supply, spurred glyphosate-resistant weeds, and exposed non-target organisms to glyphosate. Glyphosate targets EPSPS/AroA/Aro1 (orthologs across plants, bacteria, and fungi), the rate-limiting step in the production of aromatic amino acids from the shikimate pathway. Metazoans lacking this pathway are spared from acute toxicity and acquire their aromatic amino acids from their diet. However, glyphosate resistance is increasing in non-target organisms. Mutations and natural genetic variation discovered in Saccharomyces cerevisiae illustrate similar types of glyphosate resistance mechanisms in fungi, plants, and bacteria, in addition to known resistance mechanisms such as mutations in Aro1 that block glyphosate binding (target-site resistance (TSR)) and mutations in efflux drug transporters non-target-site resistance (NTSR). Recently, genetic variation and mutations in an amino transporter affecting glyphosate resistance have uncovered potential off-target effects of glyphosate in fungi and bacteria. While glyphosate is a glycine analog, it is transported into cells using an aspartic/glutamic acid (D/E) transporter. The size, shape, and charge distribution of glyphosate closely resembles D/E, and, therefore, glyphosate is a D/E amino acid mimic. The mitochondria use D/E in several pathways and mRNA-encoding mitochondrial proteins are differentially expressed during glyphosate exposure. Mutants downstream of Aro1 are not only sensitive to glyphosate but also a broad range of other chemicals that cannot be rescued by exogenous supplementation of aromatic amino acids. Glyphosate also decreases the pH when unbuffered and many studies do not consider the differences in pH that affect toxicity and resistance mechanisms.
草甘膦最初以 RoundUp 的品牌销售,是历史上最受欢迎的除草剂,因为它对后生动物的急性毒性低,对植物物种具有广谱效果。草甘膦抗性作物的发展导致了草甘膦使用量的增加,以及使用草甘膦基除草剂(GBH)带来的后果。草甘膦已经进入了食物链,刺激了抗草甘膦杂草的产生,并使非靶标生物暴露于草甘膦之下。草甘膦的作用靶点是 EPSPS/AroA/Aro1(植物、细菌和真菌中的同源物),这是芳香族氨基酸从莽草酸途径生成的限速步骤。缺乏这条途径的后生动物不会受到急性毒性的影响,而是从其饮食中获取芳香族氨基酸。然而,非靶标生物中的草甘膦抗性正在增加。在酿酒酵母中发现的突变和自然遗传变异说明了真菌、植物和细菌中类似的草甘膦抗性机制,除了已知的抗性机制,如 Aro1 中的突变阻止草甘膦结合(靶标位点抗性(TSR))和非靶标位点的外排药物转运蛋白突变(NTSR)。最近,影响草甘膦抗性的氨基酸转运体中的遗传变异和突变揭示了草甘膦在真菌和细菌中的潜在非靶标效应。虽然草甘膦是甘氨酸的类似物,但它是通过使用天冬氨酸/谷氨酸(D/E)转运体进入细胞的。草甘膦的大小、形状和电荷分布与 D/E 非常相似,因此草甘膦是 D/E 氨基酸的模拟物。线粒体在几个途径中使用 D/E,并且在草甘膦暴露期间,编码线粒体蛋白的 mRNA 表达不同。Aro1 下游的突变体不仅对草甘膦敏感,而且对其他多种无法通过外源芳香族氨基酸补充来挽救的化学物质敏感。草甘膦在未缓冲时还会降低 pH 值,而许多研究并未考虑影响毒性和抗性机制的 pH 值差异。