Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, South-1, West-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8543, Hokkaido, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sapporo Maruyama Orthopaedic Hospital, South-1, West-16, Chuo-ku, Sapporo, 060-8543, Hokkaido, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2024 May;29(3):762-768. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
Lumbar radicular pain is a common symptom of lumbar disc herniation and spinal canal stenosis, and L4 nerve root impingement is difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to elucidate the extension rate of L4 nerve roots in Thiel-embalmed specimens using both classic and new femoral nerve stretch test (FNST), as well as straight leg raising test (SLRT). Additionally, the extension rate of the L2 and L3 nerve roots and L5 and S1 roots were determined using FNST (both classic and new) and SLRT, respectively.
Four Thiel-embalmed specimens were used. The extension rate data of the nerve root were obtained using a displacement sensor under the following conditions: knee joint flexed to 0°/45°/90°/135° with either the hip extension/flexion of 0° (classic FNST) or extension of 15° (new FNST); and hip joint flexed to 0°/30°/60°/90° with the knee flexion of 0° (SLRT).
Case A had almost no L4 nerve root lengthening at 45° and 90° knee joint flexion; however, at 135° of knee flexion, the nerve root was lengthened. In Case B, the L4 nerve root was hardly extended by the classic FNST, but it was extended at 135° of knee flexion and 15° of hip extension. In Case C, the L4 nerve root showed little change by classic FNST and it was shortened by new FNST, whereas, it was extended by SLRT. Case D showed a shortened L4 nerve root at 135° of knee flexion in classic FNST and at 0°/45°/90°/135° of knee flexion and 15° of hip extension. Further, no root shortening was observed for L2 and L3 nerve roots according to both classic and new FNST. In contrast, the extension of L2 and L3 nerve root with the new FNST was high. In all cases, nerve roots were lengthened by the SLRT. Further, as the hip flexion angle increased, the rate of nerve elongation also increased.
It was shown that in patients in whom L4 nerve root was extended by FNST, it was shortened by SLRT. The opposite pattern was also observed. Further, it is believed that FNST and SLRT are reliable tests for L2 and L3 radiculopathy and L5 and S1 radiculopathy, respectively, and that more tension on the femoral and sciatic nerves is better. Furthermore, we recommend that FNST should be performed with 15° hip extension and 135° knee flexion to improve the diagnostic accuracy.
腰椎神经根痛是腰椎间盘突出症和椎管狭窄症的常见症状,而 L4 神经根受压则难以诊断。本研究旨在通过经典和新型股神经拉伸试验(FNST)以及直腿抬高试验(SLRT),阐明在 Thiel 防腐标本中 L4 神经根的延伸率。此外,还分别使用经典和新型 FNST 以及 SLRT 确定 L2 和 L3 神经根以及 L5 和 S1 神经根的延伸率。
使用 4 个 Thiel 防腐标本。在以下条件下,使用位移传感器获得神经根的延伸率数据:膝关节分别在 0°/45°/90°/135°,髋关节伸展/弯曲 0°(经典 FNST)或伸展 15°(新型 FNST);髋关节弯曲 0°/30°/60°/90°,膝关节弯曲 0°(SLRT)。
病例 A 在膝关节 45°和 90°弯曲时 L4 神经根几乎没有延长,但在膝关节 135°弯曲时神经根延长。病例 B 中,经典 FNST 几乎不能伸展 L4 神经根,但在膝关节 135°弯曲和髋关节伸展 15°时可以伸展。病例 C 中,经典 FNST 显示 L4 神经根变化不大,新型 FNST 显示缩短,而 SLRT 显示延长。病例 D 在经典 FNST 中,膝关节 135°弯曲时 L4 神经根缩短,膝关节 0°/45°/90°/135°弯曲和髋关节伸展 15°时也缩短。此外,根据经典和新型 FNST,L2 和 L3 神经根均未见缩短。相反,新型 FNST 伸展 L2 和 L3 神经根的程度较高。在所有情况下,SLRT 都能延长神经根。此外,随着髋关节弯曲角度的增加,神经根伸长率也随之增加。
在 FNST 中伸展的 L4 神经根在 SLRT 中缩短,反之亦然。此外,我们认为 FNST 和 SLRT 分别是 L2 和 L3 神经根病和 L5 和 S1 神经根病的可靠试验,股神经和坐骨神经的张力越大越好。此外,我们建议在进行 FNST 时,髋关节伸展 15°,膝关节弯曲 135°,以提高诊断准确性。