From the Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham (S.P.B.); LungenClinic Grosshansdorf and Christian Albrechts University of Kiel, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Grosshansdorf (K.F.R.), and the Department of Medicine, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, University of Marburg, German Center for Lung Research, Marburg (C.F.V.) - all in Germany; the Department of Medicine, Section on Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (N.A.H.); OK Clinical Research, Edmond, OK (J.C.); King's Centre for Lung Health, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London (M.B.), and Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester (D.S.) - both in the United Kingdom; the Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco (S.A.C.); the University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy (A.P.); Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ (E.L., H.W.S., X.L., D.B.); Sanofi, Chilly-Mazarin, France (L.P.M.); Sanofi, Cambridge, MA (N.P., L.B.R., R.M.A.); and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY (G.D.Y., E.R.M., B.A., J.M., A.B.).
N Engl J Med. 2023 Jul 20;389(3):205-214. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303951. Epub 2023 May 21.
In some patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type 2 inflammation may increase exacerbation risk and may be indicated by elevated blood eosinophil counts. Dupilumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, blocks the shared receptor component for interleukin-4 and interleukin-13, key drivers of type 2 inflammation.
In a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with COPD who had a blood eosinophil count of at least 300 per microliter and an elevated exacerbation risk despite the use of standard triple therapy to receive dupilumab (300 mg) or placebo subcutaneously once every 2 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations of COPD. Key secondary and other end points that were corrected for multiplicity were the change in the prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) and in the scores on the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ; range, 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating a better quality of life) and the Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD (E-RS-COPD; range, 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating less severe symptoms).
A total of 939 patients underwent randomization: 468 to the dupilumab group and 471 to the placebo group. The annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations was 0.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.93) with dupilumab and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.30) with placebo (rate ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.86; P<0.001). The prebronchodilator FEV increased from baseline to week 12 by a least-squares (LS) mean of 160 ml (95% CI, 126 to 195) with dupilumab and 77 ml (95% CI, 42 to 112) with placebo (LS mean difference, 83 ml; 95% CI, 42 to 125; P<0.001), a difference that was sustained through week 52. At week 52, the SGRQ score had improved by an LS mean of -9.7 (95% CI, -11.3 to -8.1) with dupilumab and -6.4 (95% CI, -8.0 to -4.8) with placebo (LS mean difference, -3.4; 95% CI, -5.5 to -1.3; P = 0.002). The E-RS-COPD score at week 52 had improved by an LS mean of -2.7 (95% CI, -3.2 to -2.2) with dupilumab and -1.6 (95% CI, -2.1 to -1.1) with placebo (LS mean difference, -1.1; 95% CI, -1.8 to -0.4; P = 0.001). The numbers of patients with adverse events that led to discontinuation of dupilumab or placebo, serious adverse events, and adverse events that led to death were balanced in the two groups.
Among patients with COPD who had type 2 inflammation as indicated by elevated blood eosinophil counts, those who received dupilumab had fewer exacerbations, better lung function and quality of life, and less severe respiratory symptoms than those who received placebo. (Funded by Sanofi and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals; BOREAS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03930732.).
在一些慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,2 型炎症可能会增加加重风险,并且可以通过升高的血嗜酸性粒细胞计数来指示。Dupilumab 是一种完全人源单克隆抗体,可阻断白细胞介素-4 和白细胞介素-13 的共享受体成分,这是 2 型炎症的关键驱动因素。
在一项 3 期、双盲、随机试验中,我们将血嗜酸性粒细胞计数至少为 300 个/微升且尽管使用标准三联疗法仍有加重风险的 COPD 患者随机分配接受 dupilumab(300mg)或安慰剂皮下注射,每 2 周一次。主要终点是 COPD 中度或重度加重的年发生率。经多重校正的关键次要终点和其他终点是:用力呼气量(FEV)的预支气管扩张前变化和圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ;范围 0 至 100,分数越低表示生活质量越好)和 COPD 呼吸症状评估(E-RS-COPD;范围 0 至 40,分数越低表示症状越不严重)。
共有 939 名患者接受了随机分组:468 名患者接受 dupilumab 治疗,471 名患者接受安慰剂治疗。dupilumab 组的中度或重度加重年发生率为 0.78(95%置信区间[CI],0.64 至 0.93),安慰剂组为 1.10(95%CI,0.93 至 1.30)(发生率比,0.70;95%CI,0.58 至 0.86;P<0.001)。从基线到第 12 周,dupilumab 组的预支气管扩张 FEV 增加了最小二乘(LS)均值 160ml(95%CI,126 至 195),安慰剂组为 77ml(95%CI,42 至 112)(LS 平均差异,83ml;95%CI,42 至 125;P<0.001),这种差异持续到第 52 周。在第 52 周时,SGRQ 评分改善 LS 均值为-9.7(95%CI,-11.3 至 -8.1),安慰剂组为-6.4(95%CI,-8.0 至 -4.8)(LS 平均差异,-3.4;95%CI,-5.5 至 -1.3;P = 0.002)。E-RS-COPD 评分在第 52 周时改善 LS 均值为-2.7(95%CI,-3.2 至 -2.2),安慰剂组为-1.6(95%CI,-2.1 至 -1.1)(LS 平均差异,-1.1;95%CI,-1.8 至 -0.4;P = 0.001)。两组中因不良事件而导致停药、严重不良事件和导致死亡的不良事件数量均保持平衡。
在血嗜酸性粒细胞计数升高提示 2 型炎症的 COPD 患者中,与安慰剂组相比,接受 dupilumab 治疗的患者发生加重的次数更少,肺功能和生活质量更好,且呼吸症状更不严重。(由 Sanofi 和 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals 资助;BOREAS 临床试验.gov 编号,NCT03930732)。