Suppr超能文献

人类学对开放对话研究的贡献:民族志研究方法与机遇

The contribution of anthropology to the study of Open Dialogue: ethnographic research methods and opportunities.

作者信息

Mosse David, Baker Darren, Carroll Molly, Chase Liana, Kloocke Ruth, Wickremasinghe Kiara, Cramer Bethan, Pratt-Boyden Keira, Wuerth Milena

机构信息

Department of Anthropology and Sociology, SOAS University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 May 11;14:1111588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1111588. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

When Open Dialogue diversifies internationally as an approach to mental healthcare, so too do the research methodologies used to describe, explain and evaluate this alternative to existing psychiatric services. This article considers the contribution of anthropology and its core method of ethnography among these approaches. It reviews the methodological opportunities in mental health research opened up by anthropology, and specifically the detailed knowledge about clinical processes and institutional contexts. Such knowledge is important in order to generalize innovations in practice by identifying contextual factors necessary to implementation that are unknowable in advance. The article explains the ethnographic mode of investigation, exploring this in more detail with an account of the method of one anthropological study under way in the UK focused on Peer-Supported Open Dialogue (POD) in the National Health Service (NHS). It sets out the objectives, design and scope of this research study, the varied roles of researchers, the sites of field research and the specific interaction between ethnography and Open Dialogue. This study is original in its design, context, conduct and the kind of data produced, and presents both opportunities and challenges. These are explained in order to raise issues of method that are of wider relevance to Open Dialogue research and anthropology.

摘要

当开放对话作为一种精神卫生保健方法在国际上实现多样化时,用于描述、解释和评估这种现有精神科服务替代方案的研究方法也会如此。本文探讨了人类学及其核心人种志方法在这些方法中的贡献。它回顾了人类学为精神卫生研究带来的方法学机遇,特别是关于临床过程和机构背景的详细知识。为了通过识别实施过程中事先无法知晓的必要背景因素来推广实践中的创新,这类知识很重要。本文解释了人种志调查模式,并通过介绍英国一项正在进行的人类学研究方法进行更详细的探讨,该研究聚焦于国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中的同伴支持开放对话(POD)。它阐述了这项研究的目标、设计和范围、研究人员的不同角色、实地研究地点以及人种志与开放对话之间的具体互动。这项研究在设计、背景、实施以及所产生的数据类型方面都具有创新性,同时带来了机遇和挑战。对这些进行了解释,以便提出与开放对话研究和人类学更广泛相关的方法问题。

相似文献

1
The contribution of anthropology to the study of Open Dialogue: ethnographic research methods and opportunities.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 11;14:1111588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1111588. eCollection 2023.
2
Everyday comforting practices in psychiatric hospital environments: A design anthropology approach.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;28(4):644-655. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12711. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
6
7
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

3
Making Good of Crisis: Temporalities of Care in UK Mental Health Services.
Med Anthropol. 2022 Apr;41(3):315-328. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2021.2018586. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
5
Competing Responsibilities and the Distribution of Outcome through Dialogic Practice.
Med Anthropol. 2022 Jan;41(1):81-93. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2021.2002858. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
6
The Challenge of Indigenous Healing for Global Mental Health.
Transcult Psychiatry. 2023 Jun;60(3):443-456. doi: 10.1177/13634615211038167. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
7
Client and Family Responses to an Open Dialogue Approach in Early Intervention in Psychosis: A Prospective Qualitative Case Study.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Apr;43(4):308-316. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1986758. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
8
Implementing Open Dialogue approaches: A scoping review.
Fam Process. 2021 Dec;60(4):1117-1133. doi: 10.1111/famp.12695. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
9
Ethnography in Health Services Research: Oscillation Between Theory and Practice.
Qual Health Res. 2021 Sep;31(11):2029-2040. doi: 10.1177/10497323211022312. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
Power, Privilege and Knowledge: the Untenable Promise of Co-production in Mental "Health".
Front Sociol. 2019 Jul 16;4:57. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00057. eCollection 2019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验