Mosse David, Baker Darren, Carroll Molly, Chase Liana, Kloocke Ruth, Wickremasinghe Kiara, Cramer Bethan, Pratt-Boyden Keira, Wuerth Milena
Department of Anthropology and Sociology, SOAS University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2023 May 11;14:1111588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1111588. eCollection 2023.
When Open Dialogue diversifies internationally as an approach to mental healthcare, so too do the research methodologies used to describe, explain and evaluate this alternative to existing psychiatric services. This article considers the contribution of anthropology and its core method of ethnography among these approaches. It reviews the methodological opportunities in mental health research opened up by anthropology, and specifically the detailed knowledge about clinical processes and institutional contexts. Such knowledge is important in order to generalize innovations in practice by identifying contextual factors necessary to implementation that are unknowable in advance. The article explains the ethnographic mode of investigation, exploring this in more detail with an account of the method of one anthropological study under way in the UK focused on Peer-Supported Open Dialogue (POD) in the National Health Service (NHS). It sets out the objectives, design and scope of this research study, the varied roles of researchers, the sites of field research and the specific interaction between ethnography and Open Dialogue. This study is original in its design, context, conduct and the kind of data produced, and presents both opportunities and challenges. These are explained in order to raise issues of method that are of wider relevance to Open Dialogue research and anthropology.
当开放对话作为一种精神卫生保健方法在国际上实现多样化时,用于描述、解释和评估这种现有精神科服务替代方案的研究方法也会如此。本文探讨了人类学及其核心人种志方法在这些方法中的贡献。它回顾了人类学为精神卫生研究带来的方法学机遇,特别是关于临床过程和机构背景的详细知识。为了通过识别实施过程中事先无法知晓的必要背景因素来推广实践中的创新,这类知识很重要。本文解释了人种志调查模式,并通过介绍英国一项正在进行的人类学研究方法进行更详细的探讨,该研究聚焦于国民医疗服务体系(NHS)中的同伴支持开放对话(POD)。它阐述了这项研究的目标、设计和范围、研究人员的不同角色、实地研究地点以及人种志与开放对话之间的具体互动。这项研究在设计、背景、实施以及所产生的数据类型方面都具有创新性,同时带来了机遇和挑战。对这些进行了解释,以便提出与开放对话研究和人类学更广泛相关的方法问题。