Niu Emily L, Milewski Matthew D, Finlayson Craig J, Stinson Zachary S, Joughin Elaine, Nepple Jeffrey J, Schmale Gregory A, Beck Jennifer J
Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 May 30;11(5):23259671231174475. doi: 10.1177/23259671231174475. eCollection 2023 May.
Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) has a varied and complex morphology that can be challenging to assess and treat. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used for diagnosis and surgical planning; however, it is not known whether surgeons are reliable and accurate in their interpretation of MRI findings when defining the pathomorphology of DLM.
Surgeons experienced in treating DLM are able to reliably interpret DLM pathology using MRI.
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.
Knee MRI scans from 44 patients (45 knees) were selected from a pool of surgically treated patients with DLM. Five reviewers (fellowship-trained pediatric sports medicine surgeons) performed independent review of each MRI scan using the PRiSM Discoid Meniscus Classification. Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the rating factors-primary (width, height, presence of peripheral instability or tear) and secondary (location of instability or tear, tear type)-was assessed using the Fleiss κ coefficient, designed for multiple readers with nominal variables (fair reliability, 0.21-0.40; moderate, 0.41-0.60; substantial, 0.61-0.80; excellent, 0.81-1.00). Reliability is reported as κ (95% CI).
Interobserver reliability in assessing most primary and secondary characteristics ranged from substantial (meniscal width) to moderate (peripheral instability, anterior instability, posterior instability, and posterior tear). Intraobserver reliability for most characteristics ranged from substantial (peripheral instability, presence of tear, anterior instability, posterior instability, and posterior tear) to moderate (meniscal width, anterior tear, and tear type). Notable exceptions were presence of tear, anterior tear, and tear type-all with fair interobserver reliability. Height had poor interobserver reliability and fair intraobserver reliability.
Orthopaedic surgeons reliably interpret MRI scans using the PRiSM Discoid Meniscus Classification for the majority of DLM characteristics but vary in their assessment of height and presence and type of tear. MRI evaluation may be helpful to diagnose discoid by width and identify the presence of instability: 2 major factors in the decision to proceed with surgery. Arthroscopic evaluation should be used in conjunction with MRI findings for complete DLM diagnosis.
盘状外侧半月板(DLM)具有多样且复杂的形态,这可能给评估和治疗带来挑战。术前磁共振成像(MRI)常用于诊断和手术规划;然而,在定义DLM的病理形态时,外科医生对MRI结果的解读是否可靠和准确尚不清楚。
有DLM治疗经验的外科医生能够通过MRI可靠地解读DLM病理。
队列研究(诊断);证据等级,3级。
从一组接受手术治疗的DLM患者中选取44例患者(45个膝关节)的膝关节MRI扫描图像。5名评审员(经过专科培训的儿童运动医学外科医生)使用PRiSM盘状半月板分类法对每张MRI扫描图像进行独立评审。使用Fleiss κ系数评估评级因素(主要因素:宽度、高度、外周不稳定或撕裂的存在;次要因素:不稳定或撕裂的位置、撕裂类型)的观察者间和观察者内可靠性,该系数适用于具有名义变量的多个读者(可靠性一般,0.21 - 0.40;中等,0.41 - 0.60;较高,0.61 - 0.80;优秀,0.81 - 1.00)。可靠性报告为κ(95%置信区间)。
在评估大多数主要和次要特征时,观察者间可靠性范围从较高(半月板宽度)到中等(外周不稳定、前侧不稳定、后侧不稳定和后侧撕裂)。大多数特征的观察者内可靠性范围从较高(外周不稳定、撕裂的存在、前侧不稳定、后侧不稳定和后侧撕裂)到中等(半月板宽度、前侧撕裂和撕裂类型)。明显的例外是撕裂的存在、前侧撕裂和撕裂类型——观察者间可靠性均为一般。高度的观察者间可靠性较差,观察者内可靠性为一般。
骨科医生使用PRiSM盘状半月板分类法能够可靠地解读大多数DLM特征的MRI扫描图像,但在高度以及撕裂的存在和类型的评估上存在差异。MRI评估可能有助于通过宽度诊断盘状半月板并识别不稳定的存在:这是决定是否进行手术的两个主要因素。关节镜评估应与MRI结果结合使用,以进行完整的DLM诊断。