Department of Emergency Medicine.
Department of Epidemiology, MCL Academy, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 1;30(4):244-251. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001046. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
Procedural sedation is routinely performed for procedures in the emergency department (ED). Propofol is a commonly used sedative, frequently combined with an opioid or low-dose ketamine as an analgesic. However, there is still controversy on the optimal combination of agents in current guidelines. The objective of this systematic review is to identify and present studies comparing low-dose ketamine to opioids when combined with propofol for procedural sedation in the ED and to describe the dosing regimen, observed efficacy, and side effects. For this systematic review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines, EMBASE and PubMed databases were searched. Studies comparing propofol with opioids versus propofol with low-dose (es)ketamine in patients undergoing procedural sedation for procedures in the ED were included. Analyses were descriptive because of the high heterogeneity among included studies. The outcomes were dosing regimen, efficacy of analgesia, efficacy of sedation depth, efficacy of recovery and (adverse) events. We included four out of 2309 studies found in the literature search. Overall, the studies had a low risk of bias, but the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation evidence profile was downgraded due to the imprecision and inconsistency of the studies. All studies compared low-dose ketamine with fentanyl. Dosing ranged from 0.3 to 1.0 mg/kg (ketamine), 1.0-1.5 μg/kg (fentanyl) and 0.4-1.0 mg/kg (propofol). The efficacy of analgesia was measured by two studies, one favoring the fentanyl group, and one favoring the ketamine group. The efficacy of sedation depth was measured by one study, with the fentanyl group having a deeper sedation score. Two studies showed shorter recovery time with low-dose ketamine. One study showed a higher incidence of cardio-respiratory clinical events and interventions in the fentanyl group. Two studies showed significant differences of overall sedation events in the fentanyl group. One study did not find any significant differences of the incidence of sedation events. This systematic review did not provide sufficient evidence that the combination of low-dose ketamine and propofol is associated with a shorter recovery time and fewer sedation events compared to the combination of opioids and propofol.
在急诊科(ED)进行的程序中,通常会进行程序性镇静。丙泊酚是一种常用的镇静剂,常与阿片类药物或低剂量氯胺酮联合使用作为镇痛药。然而,在当前的指南中,关于最佳药物组合仍存在争议。本系统评价的目的是确定并介绍比较丙泊酚与低剂量氯胺酮联合用于 ED 中程序性镇静的研究,并描述给药方案、观察到的疗效和副作用。 对于本系统评价,根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南,搜索了 EMBASE 和 PubMed 数据库。纳入了比较丙泊酚与阿片类药物与丙泊酚与低剂量(es)氯胺酮在接受 ED 程序镇静的患者中的研究。由于纳入研究之间存在高度异质性,因此分析为描述性分析。结果是给药方案、镇痛效果、镇静深度效果、恢复效果和(不良)事件。我们从文献检索中找到了 2309 项研究中的 4 项。总体而言,这些研究的偏倚风险较低,但由于研究的不准确性和不一致性,推荐评估、制定和评估证据概况被降级。所有研究均比较了低剂量氯胺酮与芬太尼。剂量范围为 0.3 至 1.0mg/kg(氯胺酮)、1.0-1.5μg/kg(芬太尼)和 0.4-1.0mg/kg(丙泊酚)。两项研究测量了镇痛效果,一项有利于芬太尼组,一项有利于氯胺酮组。一项研究测量了镇静深度效果,芬太尼组的镇静评分更深。两项研究表明,低剂量氯胺酮组的恢复时间更短。一项研究显示,芬太尼组发生心肺临床事件和干预的发生率更高。两项研究显示,芬太尼组的总体镇静事件发生率存在显著差异。一项研究未发现镇静事件发生率有任何显著差异。本系统评价没有提供足够的证据表明,与阿片类药物和丙泊酚联合使用相比,低剂量氯胺酮和丙泊酚联合使用与恢复时间更短和更少的镇静事件相关。