面向非专业人士的研究摘要中可信度的指标:科学性优于易懂性。
Indicators of trustworthiness in lay-friendly research summaries: Scientificness surpasses easiness.
机构信息
Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID), Germany.
出版信息
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Jan;33(1):37-57. doi: 10.1177/09636625231176377. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
Lay readers' trust in scientific texts can be shaped by perceived text easiness and scientificness. The two effects seem vital in a time of rapid science information sharing, yet have so far only been examined separately. A preregistered online study was conducted to assess them jointly, to probe for author and text trustworthiness overlap, and to investigate interindividual influences on the effects. = 1467 lay readers read four short research summaries, with easiness and scientificness (high vs low) being experimentally varied. A more scientific writing style led to higher perceived author and text trustworthiness. Higher personal justification belief, lower justification by multiple-sources belief, and lower need for cognitive closure attenuated the influence of scientificness on trustworthiness. However, text easiness showed no influence on trustworthiness and no interaction with text scientificness. Implications for future studies and suggestions for enhancing the perceived trustworthiness of research summaries are discussed.
非专业读者对科学文本的信任可以通过感知到的文本易读性和科学性来塑造。这两个效果在快速分享科学信息的时代似乎至关重要,但迄今为止,它们仅被分别研究过。一项预先注册的在线研究评估了它们的共同作用,探究了作者和文本可信度的重叠,并调查了个体差异对这些作用的影响。1467 名非专业读者阅读了四个简短的研究摘要,实验性地改变了易读性和科学性(高与低)。更科学的写作风格会导致更高的感知作者和文本可信度。更高的个人理由信念、更低的多来源理由信念以及更低的认知封闭性需求会减弱科学性对可信度的影响。然而,文本易读性对可信度没有影响,也与文本科学性没有相互作用。讨论了对未来研究的影响和提高研究摘要感知可信度的建议。
相似文献
Public Underst Sci. 2024-1
引用本文的文献
本文引用的文献
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020-1
Public Underst Sci. 2019-7-28
Science. 2018-3-9
Public Underst Sci. 2016-11-30