Metabolomic differentiation of tumor core versus edge in glioma.

OBJECTIVE

Gliomas exhibit high intratumor and interpatient heterogeneity. Recently, it has been shown that the microenvironment and phenotype differ significantly between the glioma core (inner) and edge (infiltrating) regions. This proof-of-concept study differentiates metabolic signatures associated with these regions, with the potential for prognosis and targeted therapy that could improve surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Paired glioma core and infiltrating edge samples were obtained from 27 patients after craniotomy. Liquid-liquid metabolite extraction was performed on the samples and metabolomic data were obtained via 2D liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry. To gauge the potential of metabolomics to identify clinically relevant predictors of survival from tumor core versus edge tissues, a boosted generalized linear machine learning model was used to predict metabolomic profiles associated with O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation.

RESULTS

A panel of 66 (of 168) metabolites was found to significantly differ between glioma core and edge regions (p ≤ 0.05). Top metabolites with significantly different relative abundances included DL-alanine, creatine, cystathionine, nicotinamide, and D-pantothenic acid. Significant metabolic pathways identified by quantitative enrichment analysis included glycerophospholipid metabolism; butanoate metabolism; cysteine and methionine metabolism; glycine, serine, alanine, and threonine metabolism; purine metabolism; nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism; and pantothenate and coenzyme A biosynthesis. The machine learning model using 4 key metabolites each within core and edge tissue specimens predicted MGMT promoter methylation status, with AUROCEdge = 0.960 and AUROCCore = 0.941. Top metabolites associated with MGMT status in the core samples included hydroxyhexanoycarnitine, spermine, succinic anhydride, and pantothenic acid, and in the edge samples metabolites included 5-cytidine monophosphate, pantothenic acid, itaconic acid, and uridine.

CONCLUSIONS

Key metabolic differences are identified between core and edge tissue in glioma and, furthermore, demonstrate the potential for machine learning to provide insight into potential prognostic and therapeutic targets.