Zhu Linxi, Yang Yifei, Cheng Hao, Cai Zhenghua, Tang Neng, Mao Liang, Fu Xu, Qiu Yudong
Department of Pancreatobiliary Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Gland Surg. 2023 May 30;12(5):593-608. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-648. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
The role of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on obstructive jaundice patients is still controversial. The aim of this retrospective study is to clarify the effect of PBD on postoperative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and explore a reasonable PBD strategy for periampullary carcinomas (PAC) patients with obstructive jaundice before surgery.
A total of 148 patients with obstructive jaundice who underwent PD were enrolled in this research and divided into drainage group and no-drainage group according to whether they received PBD. Patients who received PBD were classified into long-term group (>2 weeks) and short-term group (≤2 weeks) according to PBD duration. The clinical data of patients were statistically compared between groups to explore the influence of PBD and its duration. Analysis of pathogens in bile and peritoneal fluid was performed to probe the role of bile pathogens in opportunistic pathogenic bacterial infection after PD.
Of all, 98 patients underwent PBD. The mean duration between drainage and surgery was 13 days. Regarding postoperative outcomes, the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal infection was significantly higher in the drainage group than the no-drainage group (P=0.026). In patients with total bilirubin (TB) less than 250 µmol/L, postoperative intra-abdominal infection was more frequently observed in the drainage group compared to the no-drainage group (P=0.022). Compared to the short-term drainage group, the proportion of positive ascites culture was significantly higher in the long-term drainage group (P=0.022). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications between short-term group and no-drainage group. The most frequent pathogens detected in bile were , hemolytic Streptococcus and Enterococcus faecalis. The most commonly detected pathogens in peritoneal fluid were , and Staphylococcus epidermidis which appeared to have a high agreement with pathogens in preoperative bile cultures.
Routine PBD should not be performed in obstructive jaundice PAC patients with TB less than 250 µmol/L. For patients with indications for PBD, the drainage duration should be controlled within 2 weeks. Bile bacteria may represent a major source of opportunistic pathogenic bacteria infection after PD.
术前胆道引流(PBD)对梗阻性黄疸患者的作用仍存在争议。本回顾性研究的目的是阐明PBD对胰十二指肠切除术(PD)术后结局的影响,并探索术前对壶腹周围癌(PAC)合并梗阻性黄疸患者合理的PBD策略。
本研究共纳入148例接受PD的梗阻性黄疸患者,根据是否接受PBD分为引流组和非引流组。接受PBD的患者根据PBD持续时间分为长期组(>2周)和短期组(≤2周)。对两组患者的临床资料进行统计学比较,以探讨PBD及其持续时间的影响。对胆汁和腹腔积液中的病原体进行分析,以探究胆汁病原体在PD术后机会性病原菌感染中的作用。
共有98例患者接受了PBD。引流与手术之间的平均持续时间为13天。关于术后结局,引流组术后腹腔内感染的发生率显著高于非引流组(P=0.026)。在总胆红素(TB)低于250µmol/L的患者中,与非引流组相比,引流组术后腹腔内感染更为常见(P=0.022)。与短期引流组相比,长期引流组腹水培养阳性的比例显著更高(P=0.022)。短期组与非引流组术后并发症无统计学显著差异。胆汁中最常检测到的病原体是溶血链球菌和粪肠球菌。腹腔积液中最常检测到的病原体是大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和表皮葡萄球菌,它们似乎与术前胆汁培养中的病原体高度一致。
TB低于250µmol/L的梗阻性黄疸PAC患者不应常规进行PBD。对于有PBD指征的患者,引流持续时间应控制在2周以内。胆汁细菌可能是PD术后机会性病原菌感染的主要来源。