Suppr超能文献

运用 2020 年牙髓病学病例报告首选报告条目清单对以牙外伤学为重点的病例报告的报告质量进行批判性分析:清单发布前的基线评估。

Critical analysis of the reporting quality of case reports focusing on dental traumatology using the Preferred Reporting Items for Case reports in Endodontics 2020 checklist: A baseline evaluation prior to checklist publication.

机构信息

University of Sharjah, College of Dental Medicine, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Sharjah, UAE.

College of Dentistry, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Dent Traumatol. 2023 Oct;39(5):483-494. doi: 10.1111/edt.12860. Epub 2023 Jun 9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Case Reports in Endodontics (PRICE) 2020 guidelines were published to help authors produce high-quality case reports. The aim of this study was to use the PRICE 2020 guidelines to appraise a sample of 50 case reports related to dental traumatology that were published before the guidelines were available in order to assess various parameters influencing the reporting quality.

METHODS

Fifty case reports published between 2015 and 2019 and related to dental traumatology were randomly selected from the PubMed database. Reports were assessed by two independent evaluators using the PRICE checklist. Each item received a score of "1" if the manuscript met all pertinent criteria, "0" if it was not reported, and "0.5" if it was reported insufficiently. "Not Applicable" (NA) was assigned to items that were irrelevant to a specific report. The estimated total PRICE score for each case report was computed by adding all the scores, with a maximum score of 47 minus any "NA" scores. Descriptive and Inferential statistics (Student's t-test and ANOVA) were used for analysis.

RESULTS

The percentage of case reports that fully met each applicable criteria ranged from 0% to 100%. The percentage of case reports partially satisfying each applicable criterion varied from 0% to 88%. There was a significant difference in scores for case reports published in journals with an impact factor compared with those without (p = .042). No significant difference was observed between the mean scores that compared the period of publication. There was no significant difference between journals that followed the CARE guidelines and those that did not.

CONCLUSION

Several items within the PRICE 2020 guidelines were either not reported or only partially reported in case reports related to dental traumatology prior to the checklist publication. It is recommended that authors follow the PRICE 2020 guidelines to improve the overall quality of their case reports.

摘要

背景/目的:《牙髓病学病例报告首选报告条目(PRICE)2020 指南》的发布旨在帮助作者撰写高质量的病例报告。本研究的目的是使用 PRICE 2020 指南评估一组在指南发布之前发表的 50 篇与牙外伤相关的病例报告,以评估影响报告质量的各种参数。

方法

从 PubMed 数据库中随机选择 2015 年至 2019 年发表的 50 篇与牙外伤相关的病例报告。报告由两名独立评估者使用 PRICE 清单进行评估。如果手稿符合所有相关标准,则每个项目得 1 分;如果未报告,则得 0 分;如果报告不充分,则得 0.5 分。对于与特定报告无关的项目,分配“不适用”(NA)。通过将所有得分相加,为每个病例报告计算估计的 PRICE 总分,最高得分为 47 减去任何“NA”得分。使用描述性和推断性统计(学生 t 检验和 ANOVA)进行分析。

结果

完全符合每个适用标准的病例报告比例从 0%到 100%不等。部分满足每个适用标准的病例报告比例从 0%到 88%不等。与没有影响因子的期刊相比,有影响因子的期刊发表的病例报告得分有显著差异(p=0.042)。发表时间的平均得分无显著差异。遵循 CARE 指南和不遵循 CARE 指南的期刊之间没有显著差异。

结论

在 PRICE 2020 指南发布之前,与牙外伤相关的病例报告中,有几个项目未报告或仅部分报告。建议作者遵循 PRICE 2020 指南,以提高其病例报告的整体质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验