Sydney Institute of Agriculture, The Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, 380 Werombi Road, Brownlow Hill, NSW, 2570, Australia.
School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 55, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
Planta. 2023 Jun 9;258(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04175-3.
Legumes manage both symbiotic (indirect) and non-symbiotic (direct) nitrogen acquisition pathways. Understanding and optimising the direct pathway for nitrate uptake will support greater legume growth and seed yields. Legumes have multiple pathways to acquire reduced nitrogen to grow and set seed. Apart from the symbiotic N-fixation pathway involving soil-borne rhizobia bacteria, the acquisition of nitrate and ammonia from the soil can also be an important secondary nitrogen source to meet plant N demand. The balance in N delivery between symbiotic N (indirect) and inorganic N uptake (direct) remains less clear over the growing cycle and with the type of legume under cultivation. In fertile, pH balanced agricultural soils, NO is often the predominant form of reduced N available to crop plants and will be a major contributor to whole plant N supply if provided at sufficient levels. The transport processes for NO uptake into legume root cells and its transport between root and shoot tissues involves both high and low-affinity transport systems called HATS and LATS, respectively. These proteins are regulated by external NO availability and by the N status of the cell. Other proteins also play a role in NO transport, including the voltage dependent chloride/nitrate channel family (CLC) and the S-type anion channels of the SLAC/SLAH family. CLC's are linked to NO transport across the tonoplast of vacuoles and the SLAC/SLAH's with NO efflux across the plasma membrane and out of the cell. An important step in managing the N requirements of a plant are the mechanisms involved in root N uptake and the subsequent cellular distribution within the plant. In this review, we will present the current knowledge of these proteins and what is understood on how they function in key model legumes (Lotus japonicus, Medicago truncatula and Glycine sp.). The review will examine their regulation and role in N signalling, discuss how post-translational modification affects NO transport in roots and aerial tissues and its translocation to vegetative tissues and storage/remobilization in reproductive tissues. Lastly, we will present how NOinfluences the autoregulation of nodulation and nitrogen fixation and its role in mitigating salt and other abiotic stresses.
豆类植物既能通过共生(间接)途径,也能通过非共生(直接)途径获取氮元素。了解和优化硝酸盐吸收的直接途径,将有助于提高豆科植物的生长和种子产量。豆科植物有多种途径获取还原态氮来生长和结种。除了涉及土壤根瘤菌的共生固氮途径外,从土壤中吸收硝酸盐和氨也可以成为满足植物氮需求的重要辅助氮源。在整个生长周期中,以及在不同的栽培豆科植物中,共生固氮(间接)和无机氮吸收(直接)之间的氮供应平衡还不够明确。在肥沃、pH 值均衡的农业土壤中,NO 通常是作物可利用的主要还原态氮形式,如果供应充足,它将成为植物整个氮供应的主要贡献者。NO 进入豆科植物根细胞的运输过程及其在根和茎组织之间的运输涉及高亲和和低亲和两种运输系统,分别称为 HATS 和 LATS。这些蛋白质受外部 NO 供应和细胞氮状况的调节。其他蛋白质也在 NO 运输中发挥作用,包括电压依赖性氯离子/硝酸盐通道家族 (CLC) 和 SLAC/SLAH 家族的 S 型阴离子通道。CLC 与液泡中的质膜上的 NO 运输有关,而 SLAC/SLAH 则与质膜上的 NO 外流和细胞外排有关。管理植物氮需求的一个重要步骤是涉及根氮吸收和随后在植物体内细胞分布的机制。在这篇综述中,我们将介绍这些蛋白质的现有知识,以及它们在关键模式豆科植物(日本百脉根、蒺藜苜蓿和大豆)中的功能的理解。该综述将探讨它们的调节作用及其在氮信号转导中的作用,讨论翻译后修饰如何影响根部和地上组织的 NO 运输及其向营养组织和生殖组织的运输/再利用。最后,我们将介绍 NO 如何影响根瘤和固氮的自调节及其在缓解盐和其他非生物胁迫方面的作用。