Cheng C H, Su T, Wang J, Zhu Q L, Wu H H, Wang Z J, Han F, Chen R
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine/Sleep Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215004, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 13;103(22):1685-1691. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20220909-01910.
To investigate the alertness and task processing speed impairment status in young-mild aged men with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS), and analyze its influencing factors. This prospective study recruited 251 snoring patients aged 18 to 59 (38.9±7.6) years in the Sleep Center of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from July 2020 to September 2021 and all patients were diagnosed by polysomnography (PSG). Clinical information, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) and PSG date were collected. All patients were assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) questionnaires, Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment System which includes the reaction time of Motor Screening Task (MOT) for alertness, the reaction time of pattern recognition memory (PRM), spatial span (SSP) and spatial working memory (SWM) for task processing speed. Based on AHI tertiles, all patients were divided into Q1 group (AHI<15 times/h, =79), Q2 group (15 times/h≤AHI<45 times/h, =88), and Q3 group (AHI≥45 times/h, =84). The characteristics of clinical information, ESS, PSG parameters and cognitive scores among three groups were compared. Multiple linear stepwise regression was conducted to analyze the influencing factors of cognitive impairment. There were no statistically significant differences in age, years of education, history of smoking and drinking, and past disease history (except for the prevalence of hypertension) among the 3 groups (>0.05). There were statistically significant among-group differences in the body mass index (BMI), ESS, prevalence of hypertension and complaints of daytime sleepiness (<0.05). Compared with Q1 and Q2 group, the arousal index (ArI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI),the proportion of non-rapid eye movement phase 1 and 2 (N1+N2) and percentage of total sleep time with oxygen saturation level<90% (TS90) of Q3 group were higher (all <0.05). In the cognitive assessment, there was no statistically significant difference in the MoCA total and individual scores and MMSE scores among the three groups (>0.05). Compared with the Q1 group, the task processing speed and alertness were worse in Q3 group, as shown by slower PRM immediate and delayed reaction time, SSP reaction time and MOT reaction time (all <0.05). The total time of SWM in Q2 group was slower than that in Q1 group (<0.05). Multiple linear stepwise regression showed that years of education (β=-40.182, 95%:-69.847--10.517), ODI (β=3.539, 95%: 0.600-6.478) were the risk factors of PRM immediate reaction time. Age(β=13.303,95%: 2.487-24.119), years of education(β=-32.329, 95%:-63.162--1.497), ODI (β=4.515, 95%: 1.623-7.407) were the risk factors of PRM delayed reaction time. ODI was the risk factor of SSP reaction time (β=1.258, 95%: 0.379-2.137). TS90 was the risk factor of MOT reaction time (β=1.796, 95%: 0.664-2.928). The early cognitive impairment in young-mild aged OSAHS patients was manifested in decreased alertness and task processing speed, and intermittent nocturnal hypoxia was its influencing factor in addition to age and years of education.
探讨轻、中年男性阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)患者的警觉性和任务处理速度受损状况,并分析其影响因素。本前瞻性研究于2020年7月至2021年9月在苏州大学附属第二医院睡眠中心招募了251例年龄在18至59岁(38.9±7.6)岁的打鼾患者,所有患者均通过多导睡眠图(PSG)进行诊断。收集临床信息、爱泼华嗜睡量表(ESS)和PSG数据。所有患者均接受蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)问卷、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)以及计算机化神经认知评估系统评估,该系统包括用于评估警觉性的运动筛查任务(MOT)反应时间、用于评估任务处理速度的模式识别记忆(PRM)反应时间、空间广度(SSP)和空间工作记忆(SWM)。根据呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)三分位数,将所有患者分为Q1组(AHI<15次/小时,n = 79)、Q2组(15次/小时≤AHI<45次/小时,n = 88)和Q3组(AHI≥45次/小时,n = 84)。比较三组患者的临床信息、ESS、PSG参数和认知评分特征。进行多重线性逐步回归分析以分析认知障碍的影响因素。三组患者在年龄、受教育年限、吸烟饮酒史和既往病史(高血压患病率除外)方面差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。三组患者在体重指数(BMI)、ESS、高血压患病率和日间嗜睡主诉方面差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。与Q1组和Q2组相比,Q3组的觉醒指数(ArI)、氧减饱和度指数(ODI)、非快速眼动相1和2(N1 + N2)比例以及氧饱和度<90%的总睡眠时间百分比(TS90)更高(均<0.05)。在认知评估中,三组患者的MoCA总分和单项得分以及MMSE得分差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。与Q1组相比,Q3组的任务处理速度和警觉性较差,表现为PRM即时和延迟反应时间、SSP反应时间和MOT反应时间较慢(均<0.05)。Q2组的SWM总时间比Q1组慢(<0.05)。多重线性逐步回归显示,受教育年限(β=-40.182,95%置信区间:-69.847--10.517)、ODI(β=3.539,95%置信区间:0.600 - 6.478)是PRM即时反应时间的危险因素。年龄(β=13.303,95%置信区间:2.487 - 24.119)、受教育年限(β=-32.329,95%置信区间:-63.162--1.497)、ODI(β=4.515,95%置信区间:1.623 - 7.407)是PRM延迟反应时间的危险因素。ODI是SSP反应时间的危险因素(β=1.258,95%置信区间:0.379 - 2.137)。TS90是MOT反应时间的危险因素(β=1.796,95%置信区间:0.664 - 2.928)。轻、中年OSAHS患者的早期认知障碍表现为警觉性和任务处理速度下降,除年龄和受教育年限外,夜间间歇性缺氧是其影响因素。