Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jabir IbnHayyan Medical University, Najaf, Iraq.
Department of Surgery, West Suffolk Hospital, Bury St Edmunds, England.
J Med Life. 2023 Apr;16(4):546-553. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-0332.
Despite the availability of laparoscopy, open surgery remains the most common practice for primary inguinal hernia repair in general surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the combined mesh and darn (CMD) repair compared to mesh alone (MA) repair in treating adult inguinal hernias regarding recurrence and postoperative complications. We conducted a prospective randomized study, including 330 patients with primary inguinal hernias who underwent primary inguinal hernia repair at our facilities between February 2015 and January 2018. Time spent in the hospital, time to resume regular activities, postoperative sequelae, and recurrence rates were assessed. Patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: CMD repair was performed on 165 patients (Group 1), and MA repair was done on 165 patients (Group 2). Patients were monitored for three years. The average operation time for MA was 62.2 minutes, compared to 72.9 minutes for CMD. The average time to return to normal work was comparable for both groups at around 3 weeks. In Group 2, 12 (7.1%) patients experienced postoperative complications and 3 (1.7%) recurrences. In the CMD repair group, 13 (8.1%) patients had postoperative complications, but no recurrences were observed. Hospitalization duration and postoperative pain were similar between the two groups. At the three-year follow-up, the CMD repair demonstrated a lower recurrence rate than MA, while both groups had similar postoperative complications, hospital stays, and return to normal activities. The operative time was slightly longer for CMD repair compared to MA repair.
尽管腹腔镜技术已经普及,但开放性手术仍然是普外科中最常见的原发性腹股沟疝修补术方法。本研究旨在评估在治疗成人腹股沟疝时,与单纯使用网片(MA)修补相比,联合网片和缝合(CMD)修补的效果,比较两种方法在复发率和术后并发症方面的差异。我们进行了一项前瞻性随机研究,纳入了 2015 年 2 月至 2018 年 1 月期间在我院接受原发性腹股沟疝修补术的 330 例原发性腹股沟疝患者。评估了住院时间、恢复正常活动的时间、术后后遗症和复发率。患者被随机分配到两组:165 例患者接受 CMD 修复(第 1 组),165 例患者接受 MA 修复(第 2 组)。对患者进行了三年的随访。MA 的平均手术时间为 62.2 分钟,而 CMD 为 72.9 分钟。两组患者恢复正常工作的平均时间约为 3 周。第 2 组 12 例(7.1%)患者出现术后并发症,3 例(1.7%)患者复发。在 CMD 修复组,13 例(8.1%)患者出现术后并发症,但无复发。两组患者的住院时间和术后疼痛相似。在三年的随访中,CMD 修复的复发率低于 MA 修复,而两组的术后并发症、住院时间和恢复正常活动的时间相似。与 MA 修复相比,CMD 修复的手术时间略长。