Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2023 Aug 1;29(4):315-329. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001062. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
Numerous micronutrients are involved in antioxidant and immune defence, while their blood concentrations are frequently low in critically ill patients: this has fuelled many supplementation trials. Numerous observational, randomized studies have been published, which are presented herein.
Micronutrient concentrations must be analysed considering the context of the inflammatory response in critical illness. Low levels do not always indicate a deficiency without objective micronutrients losses with biological fluids. Nevertheless, higher needs and deficiencies are frequent for some micronutrients, such as thiamine, vitamins C and D, selenium, zinc and iron, and have been acknowledged with identifying patients at risk, such as those requiring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). The most important trials and progress in understanding have occurred with vitamin D (25(OH)D), iron and carnitine. Vitamin D blood levels less than 12 ng/ml are associated with poor clinical outcomes: supplementation in deficient ICU patients generates favourable metabolic changes and decreases mortality. Single high-dose 25(OH)D should not be delivered anymore, as boluses induce a negative feedback mechanism causing inhibition of this vitamin. Iron-deficient anaemia is frequent and can be treated safely with high-dose intravenous iron under the guidance of hepcidin to confirm deficiency diagnosis.
The needs in critical illness are higher than those of healthy individuals and must be covered to support immunity. Monitoring selected micronutrients is justified in patients requiring more prolonged ICU therapy. Actual results point towards combinations of essential micronutrients at doses below upper tolerable levels. Finally, the time of high-dose micronutrient monotherapy is probably over.
许多微量营养素参与抗氧化和免疫防御,而危重病患者的血液浓度往往较低:这激发了许多补充剂试验。本文呈现了许多已发表的观察性、随机研究。
必须考虑到危重病中炎症反应的背景来分析微量营养素浓度。在没有生物体液中客观微量营养素损失的情况下,低水平并不总是表明缺乏。然而,对于某些微量营养素,如硫胺素、维生素 C 和 D、硒、锌和铁,其需求量和缺乏更为常见,并且已经通过识别有风险的患者(例如需要持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)的患者)得到了认可。最重要的试验和理解进展发生在维生素 D(25(OH)D)、铁和肉碱上。血液中维生素 D 水平低于 12ng/ml 与不良临床结局相关:在缺乏维生素 D 的 ICU 患者中补充可产生有利的代谢变化并降低死亡率。不再应该给予单次大剂量 25(OH)D,因为推注会引起负反馈机制,导致这种维生素的抑制。缺铁性贫血很常见,可以在血红素的指导下安全地使用大剂量静脉铁治疗。
危重病患者的需求量高于健康个体,必须加以满足以支持免疫。在需要更长期 ICU 治疗的患者中监测选定的微量营养素是合理的。实际结果表明,必需微量营养素的组合剂量低于可耐受上限。最后,大剂量单一微量营养素治疗的时代可能已经过去。