Valette Clarisse Audigier, Filleron Thomas, Debieuvre Didier, Lena Hervé, Pérol Maurice, Chouaid Christos, Simon Gaëtane, Quantin Xavier, Girard Nicolas
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Toulon La Seyne sur Mer, Toulon, France.
Institut Claudius Regaud IUCT, Toulouse, France.
Respir Med Res. 2023 Nov;84:101012. doi: 10.1016/j.resmer.2023.101012. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive entity of lung cancer with tendency toward early recurrence after first-line treatment. As per recently updated European Society for Medical Oncology recommendations, first-line treatment with up to 4 cycles of platinum-etoposide combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs)-targeting PD-L1, is now the standard of care. The purpose of the current analysis is to identify current patient profiles and treatment strategies in real life clinical practice, and report outcomes in Extensive Stage (ES)-SCLC.
Non-interventional, retrospective, multicentre, comparative study was carried out to describe the outcome of ES-SCLC patients included in the Epidémiologie Stratégie Médico-Economique (ESME) data platform for advanced and metastatic lung cancer. Patients were selected from 34 health care facilities between January 2015 and December 2017, before the era of immunotherapy.
1315 patients were identified, including 64% male and 78% under 70 year-old; 24% had at least 3 metastatic sites, mainly liver metastases (43%), bone metastases (36%), brain metastases (32%). 49% received only one line of systemic treatment; 30% and 21% received 2 and 3 lines or more, respectively. Carboplatin was more frequently used than cisplatin (71% and 29%, respectively). Prophylactic cranial irradiation was infrequent (4% of patients), but 16% of patients received thoracic radiation therapy, mainly after the completion of first-line chemotherapy (72% of patients); such strategies were more frequently applied in cisplatin/etoposide than carboplatin/etoposide patients (p = 0.006 and p = 0.015, respectively). After a median follow-up time of 21.8 (95% CI: 20.9-23.3) months, median real-world Progression-Free Survival (rw-PFS) was 6.2 (95% CI: 5.7; 6.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 5.8; 6.3) months for cisplatin/etoposide and carboplatin/etoposide doublet regimens, respectively; 24-month rwPFS and Overall Survival were 3.2% (95% CI: 2.3; 4;2) and 22.2% (95% CI: 19.4; 25.1) in the whole population, respectively.
Our data provide with landmark reference findings on ES-SCLC before the immunotherapy era, and cover many aspects of the treatment strategy, while highlighting on the role of radiotherapy, subsequent lines of therapy, and the outcomes of patients. Generation of real-world data focusing on patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is under way.
小细胞肺癌(SCLC)是一种侵袭性很强的肺癌类型,一线治疗后有早期复发的倾向。根据最近更新的欧洲医学肿瘤学会指南,一线治疗采用多达4个周期的铂类-依托泊苷联合靶向程序性死亡受体1配体(PD-L1)的免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs),现已成为标准治疗方案。本分析的目的是确定现实临床实践中当前的患者特征和治疗策略,并报告广泛期(ES)-SCLC的治疗结果。
开展了一项非干预性、回顾性、多中心、比较性研究,以描述纳入高级别和转移性肺癌的流行病学、策略、医学经济学(ESME)数据平台的ES-SCLC患者的治疗结果。患者选自2015年1月至2017年12月期间的34家医疗机构,处于免疫治疗时代之前。
共纳入1315例患者,其中64%为男性,78%年龄在70岁以下;24%至少有3个转移部位,主要为肝转移(43%)、骨转移(36%)、脑转移(32%)。49%的患者仅接受了一线全身治疗;30%和21%的患者分别接受了2线和3线及以上治疗。卡铂的使用频率高于顺铂(分别为71%和29%)。预防性颅脑照射不常见(4%的患者),但16%的患者接受了胸部放疗,主要在一线化疗完成后(72%的患者);顺铂/依托泊苷组比卡铂/依托泊苷组更频繁地应用此类策略(p值分别为0.006和0.015)。中位随访时间为21.8(95%CI:20.9 - 23.3)个月,顺铂/依托泊苷和卡铂/依托泊苷双联方案的中位真实世界无进展生存期(rw-PFS)分别为6.2(95%CI:5.7;6.9)个月和6.1(95%CI:5.8;6.3)个月;在整个人群中,24个月的rwPFS和总生存期分别为3.2%(95%CI:2.3;4.2)和22.2%(95%CI:19.4;25.1)。
我们的数据提供了免疫治疗时代之前ES-SCLC的标志性参考结果,涵盖了治疗策略的多个方面,同时突出了放疗的作用、后续治疗线数以及患者的治疗结果。针对接受铂类化疗联合免疫检查点抑制剂的患者的真实世界数据正在生成中。