Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, Japan.
Japan Community Health care Organization Kurume General Hospital, Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, Japan.
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 14;18(6):e0286762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286762. eCollection 2023.
This study evaluated the reliability and validity of the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12)-a measure of patients' ability to forget their joints in daily life-in patients who underwent total ankle replacement (TAR) or ankle arthrodesis (AA).
Patients who underwent TAR or AA were recruited from seven hospitals. The patients completed the Japanese version of FJS-12 twice, at an interval of two weeks, at a minimum of one year postoperatively. Additionally, they answered the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire and EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level as comparators. The construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, measurement error, and floor and ceiling effects were evaluated.
A total of 115 patients (median age, 72 years), comprising 50 and 65 patients in the TAR and AA groups respectively, were evaluated. The mean FJS-12 scores were 65 and 58 for the TAR and AA groups, respectively, with no significant difference between groups (P = 0.20). Correlations between the FJS-12 and Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire subscale scores were good to moderate. The correlation coefficient ranged from 0.39 to 0.71 and 0.55 to 0.79 in the TAR and AA groups, respectively. The correlation between the FJS-12 and EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level scores was poor in both groups. The internal consistency was adequate, with Cronbach's α greater than 0.9 in both groups. The intraclass correlation coefficients of test-retest reliability was 0.77 and 0.98 in the TAR and AA groups, respectively. The 95% minimal detectable change values were 18.0 and 7.2 points in the TAR and AA groups, respectively. No floor or ceiling effect was observed in either group.
The Japanese version of FJS-12 is a valid and reliable questionnaire for measuring joint awareness in patients with TAR or AA. The FJS-12 can be a useful tool for the postoperative assessment of patients with end-stage ankle arthritis.
本研究评估了遗忘关节评分-12 (FJS-12)的可靠性和有效性-一种评估患者日常生活中关节遗忘能力的指标-在接受全踝关节置换术(TAR)或踝关节融合术(AA)的患者中的应用。
从七家医院招募接受 TAR 或 AA 的患者。患者在术后至少一年,至少在两周的间隔内两次完成日本版 FJS-12 调查问卷,并回答自我管理足部评估问卷和 EuroQoL 5 维度 5 级问卷作为对照。评估了结构效度、内部一致性、测试-重测信度、测量误差以及地板效应和天花板效应。
共评估了 115 名患者(中位年龄 72 岁),其中 TAR 组和 AA 组各 50 例和 65 例。TAR 组和 AA 组的 FJS-12 评分分别为 65 和 58,两组间无显著差异(P = 0.20)。FJS-12 与自我管理足部评估问卷子量表评分之间存在良好到中度的相关性。TAR 组和 AA 组的相关系数分别为 0.39 至 0.71 和 0.55 至 0.79。FJS-12 与 EuroQoL 5 维度 5 级评分之间的相关性在两组中均较差。两组的内部一致性均足够,克朗巴赫的 α值均大于 0.9。TAR 组和 AA 组的测试-重测信度的组内相关系数分别为 0.77 和 0.98。95%最小可检测变化值分别为 TAR 组和 AA 组的 18.0 和 7.2 分。两组均未出现地板效应或天花板效应。
日本版 FJS-12 是一种有效且可靠的问卷,可用于测量 TAR 或 AA 患者的关节意识。FJS-12 可作为评估终末期踝关节关节炎患者术后情况的有用工具。