Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Sep;30(9):5692-5702. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-13698-8. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
Completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) was standard treatment for breast cancer with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) until 2011, when data from the Z11 and AMAROS trials challenged its survival benefit in early stage breast cancer. We assessed the contribution of patient, tumor, and facility factors on cALND use in patients undergoing mastectomy and SLN biopsy.
Using the National Cancer Database, patients diagnosed from 2012 to 2017 who underwent upfront mastectomy and SLN biopsy with at least one positive SLN were included. A multivariable mixed effects logistic regression model was used to determine the effect of patient, tumor, and facility variables on cALND use. Reference effect measures (REM) were used to compare the contribution of general contextual effects (GCE) to variation in cALND use.
From 2012 to 2017, the overall use of cALND decreased from 81.3% to 68.0%. Overall, younger patients, larger tumors, higher grade tumors, and tumors with lymphovascular invasion were more likely to undergo cALND. Facility variables, including higher surgical volume and facility location in the Midwest, were associated with increased use of cALND. However, REM results showed that the contribution of GCE to the variation in cALND use exceeded that of the measured patient, tumor, facility, and time variables.
There was a decrease in cALND use during the study period. However, cALND was frequently performed in women after mastectomy found to have a positive SLN. There is high variability in cALND use, mainly driven by interfacility practice variation rather than specific high-risk patient and/or tumor characteristics.
直到 2011 年,对于前哨淋巴结阳性的乳腺癌患者,完成腋窝淋巴结清扫术(cALND)一直是标准治疗方法,但 Z11 和 AMAROS 试验的数据对其在早期乳腺癌中的生存获益提出了挑战。我们评估了患者、肿瘤和医疗机构因素对接受乳房切除术和前哨淋巴结活检的患者行 cALND 的影响。
使用国家癌症数据库,纳入 2012 年至 2017 年间接受乳房切除术和前哨淋巴结活检且至少有一个前哨淋巴结阳性的患者。采用多变量混合效应逻辑回归模型,确定患者、肿瘤和医疗机构变量对 cALND 使用的影响。采用参考效应度量(REM)比较一般背景效应(GCE)对 cALND 使用差异的贡献。
2012 年至 2017 年,cALND 的总体使用率从 81.3%降至 68.0%。总体而言,年龄较小、肿瘤较大、肿瘤分级较高和存在淋巴管血管侵犯的患者更有可能接受 cALND。医疗机构变量,包括手术量较高和位于中西部地区,与 cALND 使用增加相关。然而,REM 结果表明,GCE 对 cALND 使用差异的贡献大于测量的患者、肿瘤、医疗机构和时间变量的贡献。
在研究期间,cALND 的使用率有所下降。然而,在接受乳房切除术且前哨淋巴结阳性的女性中,cALND 仍频繁进行。cALND 的使用存在很大差异,主要是由于医疗机构之间的实践差异,而不是特定的高风险患者和/或肿瘤特征。