Suppr超能文献

纳布啡鼻喷剂与注射用纳布啡在健康志愿者中的比较药代动力学研究。

Comparative pharmacokinetics of nalbuphine nasal spray and solution for injection in healthy volunteers.

机构信息

Pharmaceutical company Microkhim, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Clinical and Diagnostic Center Pharmbiotest, Kyiv, Ukraine.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Nov;89(11):3311-3323. doi: 10.1111/bcp.15828. Epub 2023 Jul 9.

Abstract

AIMS

Nalbuphine is a synthetic opioid with comparable analgesic activity to morphine but with a better safety profile. Nalbuphine is only available in injectable form due to low oral bioavailability. Nasal nalbuphine spray provides advantages in drug safety, avoids hepatic first-pass metabolism, is non-invasive and is convenient for patient-controlled analgesia by self-administration. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of the newly developed nalbuphine nasal spray in comparison with a solution for injections.

METHODS

Twenty-four healthy Caucasian volunteers were enrolled in this randomized, open-label, cross-over study. Subjects were administered one of the drugs: nasal spray 7.0 mg/dose, nalbuphine hydrochloride solution for injection 10 mg/dose intravenously (IV) or intramuscularly (IM). High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to determine nalbuphine concentrations.

RESULTS

A comparison of PK profiles for IV, IM and intranasal (IN) routes of nalbuphine administration revealed a close similarity of absorption phases for nasal spray and IM injection. Differences between the mean T and dose-adjusted C values for nasal spray and IM injection were statistically insignificant. The median values of the elimination rate constants and the terminal elimination half-life following IV, IM and IN nalbuphine administration were similar. The mean absolute bioavailability of the nasal spray equalled 65.04%.

CONCLUSIONS

The similarity of PK parameters of IM-injected nalbuphine solution and the nasal spray allows us to assume the latter is a feasible alternative to intramuscular nalbuphine injections appropriate for self-administration and field environments for managing moderate and severe pain of various aetiologies.

摘要

目的

纳布啡是一种合成阿片类药物,其镇痛活性与吗啡相当,但安全性更好。由于口服生物利用度低,纳布啡仅以注射剂型供应。纳布啡鼻喷雾剂具有药物安全性优势,可避免肝脏首过代谢,非侵入性,便于患者自我给药进行自控镇痛。本研究旨在评估新开发的纳布啡鼻喷雾剂与注射用溶液相比的安全性和药代动力学(PK)。

方法

24 名健康白种人志愿者参加了这项随机、开放标签、交叉研究。受试者接受以下一种药物治疗:鼻喷雾剂 7.0mg/剂量,盐酸纳布啡注射液 10mg/剂量静脉注射(IV)或肌肉注射(IM)。采用高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定纳布啡浓度。

结果

IV、IM 和 IN 途径给予纳布啡的 PK 曲线比较显示,鼻喷雾剂和 IM 注射的吸收阶段相似。鼻喷雾剂和 IM 注射的 T 均值和剂量调整后 C 值之间的差异无统计学意义。IV、IM 和 IN 纳布啡给药后消除率常数和终末消除半衰期的中位数值相似。鼻喷雾剂的平均绝对生物利用度为 65.04%。

结论

IM 注射用纳布啡溶液和鼻喷雾剂的 PK 参数相似,这使我们可以假设后者是一种可行的替代 IM 纳布啡注射的方法,适用于自我管理和各种病因引起的中度和重度疼痛的现场环境。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验