Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; University Psychiatric Centre KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Mar;105(3):571-579. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.06.002. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
To meta-analyze the prevalence and predictors of dropout rates among adults with fibromyalgia participating in exercise randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Two authors searched Embase, CINAHL, PsycARTICLES, and Medline up to 01/21/2023.
We included RCTs of exercise interventions in people with fibromyalgia that reported dropout rates.
Dropout rates from exercise and control conditions and exerciser/participant, provider, and design/implementation related predictors.
A random effects meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted. In total, 89 RCTs involving 122 exercise arms in 3.702 people with fibromyalgia were included. The trim-and-fill-adjusted prevalence of dropout across all RCTs was 19.2% (95% CI=16.9%-21.8%), which is comparable with the dropout observed in control conditions with the trim-and-fill-adjusted odds ratio being 0.31 (95% CI=0.92-1.86, P=.44). Body mass index (R=0.16, P=.03) and higher effect of illness (R=0.20, P=.02) predicted higher dropout. The lowest dropout was observed in exergaming, compared with other exercise types (P=.014), and in lower-intensity exercises, compared with high intensity exercise (P=.03). No differences in dropout were observed for the frequency or duration of the exercise intervention. Continuous supervision by an exercise expert (eg, physiotherapist) resulted in the lowest dropout rates (P<.001).
Exercise dropout in RCTs is comparable with control conditions, suggesting that exercise is a feasible and accepted treatment modality; however, interventions are ideally supervised by an expert (eg, physiotherapist) to minimize the risk of dropout. Experts should consider a high BMI and the effect of the illness as risk factors for dropout.
荟萃分析接受随机对照试验(RCT)的纤维肌痛成人中退出率的流行率和预测因素。
两位作者检索了 Embase、CINAHL、PsycARTICLES 和 Medline,检索时间截至 2023 年 01 月 21 日。
我们纳入了报告退出率的纤维肌痛患者运动干预 RCT。
运动组和对照组的退出率,以及与运动者/参与者、提供者和设计/实施相关的预测因素。
进行了随机效应荟萃分析和荟萃回归。共纳入 89 项 RCT,涉及 3702 名纤维肌痛患者的 122 个运动组。所有 RCT 中,经修剪和填充调整后的总体退出率为 19.2%(95%可信区间=16.9%-21.8%),与对照组中经修剪和填充调整后的退出率相当,调整后的比值比为 0.31(95%可信区间=0.92-1.86,P=.44)。体质指数(R=0.16,P=.03)和疾病影响较大(R=0.20,P=.02)预测更高的退出率。与其他运动类型相比,电子游戏的退出率最低(P=.014),与高强度运动相比,低强度运动的退出率更低(P=.03)。运动干预的频率或持续时间对退出率没有差异。由运动专家(如物理治疗师)持续监督可导致最低的退出率(P<.001)。
RCT 中的运动退出率与对照组相当,这表明运动是一种可行且可接受的治疗方式;然而,为了降低退出风险,干预措施理想情况下应由专家(如物理治疗师)进行监督。专家应考虑较高的 BMI 和疾病的影响作为退出的风险因素。