Quality and Accreditation Office, Medical Directorate, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, S.C. Infrastructure, Research and Statistics, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Front Public Health. 2023 Jun 2;11:1187912. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1187912. eCollection 2023.
The COVID-19 pandemic burdened health care systems worldwide. Health services were reorganized with the dual purpose of ensuring the most adequate continuity of care and, simultaneously, the safety of patients and health professionals. The provision of care to patients within cancer care pathways (cCPs) was not touched by such reorganization. We investigated whether the quality of care provided by a local comprehensive cancer center has been maintained using cCP indicators. A retrospective single-cancer center study was conducted on eleven cCPs from 2019 to 2021 by comparing three timeliness indicators, five care indicators and three outcome indicators yearly calculated on incident cases. Comparisons of indicators between 2019 and 2020, and 2019 and 2021, were performed to assess the performance of cCP function during the pandemic. Indicators displayed heterogeneous significant changes attributed to all cCPs over the study period, affecting eight (72%), seven (63%) and ten (91%) out of eleven cCPs in the comparison between 2019 and 2020, 2020 and 2021, and 2019 and 2021, respectively. The most relevant changes were attributed to a negative increase in time-to-treatment surgery-related indicators and to a positive increase in the number of cases discussed by cCP team members. No variations were found attributed to outcome indicators. Significant changes did not account for clinical relevance once discussed by cCP managers and team members. Our experience demonstrated that the CP model constitutes an appropriate tool for providing high levels of quality care, even in the most critical health situations.
COVID-19 大流行使全球卫生系统不堪重负。卫生服务进行了重组,目的是既要确保提供最适当的连续护理,又要保障患者和卫生专业人员的安全。癌症护理路径(cCP)内的患者护理并未受到这种重组的影响。我们调查了当地综合癌症中心使用 cCP 指标是否保持了提供的护理质量。对 2019 年至 2021 年期间的 11 条 cCP 进行了回顾性单癌症中心研究,每年对新发病例计算三个及时性指标、五个护理指标和三个结局指标,并进行比较。对 2019 年与 2020 年以及 2019 年与 2021 年的指标进行比较,以评估 cCP 功能在大流行期间的表现。指标显示出不均匀的显著变化,归因于研究期间所有 cCP 的影响,2019 年与 2020 年、2020 年与 2021 年以及 2019 年与 2021 年的比较中,11 条 cCP 中有 8 条(72%)、7 条(63%)和 10 条(91%)发生了变化。最相关的变化归因于与治疗手术相关的时间指标的负增长以及 cCP 团队成员讨论的病例数量的正增长。结果指标没有发现变化。cCP 经理和团队成员讨论后,认为没有显著变化与临床相关性无关。我们的经验表明,CP 模型是提供高质量护理的合适工具,即使在最关键的卫生情况下也是如此。