• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 JVP 穹顶进行触觉功能评估的方案:可行性研究和初步结果。

A protocol for tactile function assessment using JVP domes: Feasibility study and preliminary results.

机构信息

School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Department of Medical Education, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2023 Aug;13(8):e3123. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3123. Epub 2023 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.3123
PMID:37334446
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10454274/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Touch is a crucial sense for perceiving the spatial characteristics of objects. The JVP dome was developed to evaluate tactile spatial acuity using a grating orientation task. There were few studies depicting sequences and details for the entire task, including practice, training, and testing sessions. Therefore, we proposed and elaborated a protocol for the grating orientation task using the staircase method, which required fewer testing trials compared with the method of constant stimuli.

METHODS

Twenty-three healthy participants were enrolled in this experiment. The JVP domes with 11 different groove widths were used. Tactile discrimination thresholds were estimated using a two-down-one-up staircase method. The experiment comprised practice, training, and testing sessions, conducted by trained examiners who performed grating stimulation on participants' index fingerpads.

RESULTS

All participants passed the required accuracy in the practice and training sessions. Eight transition points were obtained in the testing session for each participant. The tactile discrimination thresholds were determined from the last six transition points. We obtained the mean tactile discrimination threshold as 1.8 ± 0.75 mm (n = 23). The results demonstrated that the proposed protocol was successfully applied to assess tactile discrimination thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study investigated the protocol of grating orientation tasks requiring a small number of testing trials with the assurance of the task quality. The feasibility study and preliminary results indicated the potentiality of this protocol for future clinical application.

摘要

背景

触觉是感知物体空间特征的关键感觉。JVP dome 是为了使用光栅定向任务评估触觉空间敏锐度而开发的。很少有研究描述整个任务的顺序和细节,包括练习、训练和测试阶段。因此,我们提出并详细说明了使用阶梯法进行光栅定向任务的方案,与恒定刺激法相比,该方法需要更少的测试试验。

方法

本实验纳入了 23 名健康参与者。使用了 11 种不同槽宽的 JVP dome。使用二减一增阶梯法估计触觉分辨阈值。实验包括练习、训练和测试阶段,由经过培训的考官进行,他们在参与者的指垫上进行光栅刺激。

结果

所有参与者都在练习和训练阶段通过了所需的准确性。每个参与者在测试阶段获得了 8 个转换点。触觉分辨阈值是从最后 6 个转换点确定的。我们得到的平均触觉分辨阈值为 1.8±0.75mm(n=23)。结果表明,所提出的方案成功应用于评估触觉分辨阈值。

结论

本研究调查了需要较少测试试验的光栅定向任务方案,同时保证了任务质量。可行性研究和初步结果表明,该方案具有未来临床应用的潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/7beb273e8c25/BRB3-13-e3123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/2832cfd215ca/BRB3-13-e3123-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/fb47bda7c447/BRB3-13-e3123-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/c8c245cf3cf3/BRB3-13-e3123-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/87dcea46cad8/BRB3-13-e3123-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/7beb273e8c25/BRB3-13-e3123-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/2832cfd215ca/BRB3-13-e3123-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/fb47bda7c447/BRB3-13-e3123-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/c8c245cf3cf3/BRB3-13-e3123-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/87dcea46cad8/BRB3-13-e3123-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26f5/10454274/7beb273e8c25/BRB3-13-e3123-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A protocol for tactile function assessment using JVP domes: Feasibility study and preliminary results.使用 JVP 穹顶进行触觉功能评估的方案:可行性研究和初步结果。
Brain Behav. 2023 Aug;13(8):e3123. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3123. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
2
Tactile spatial acuity in elderly persons: assessment with grating domes and relationship with manual dexterity.老年人的触觉空间敏锐度:使用光栅圆顶进行评估及其与手动灵活性的关系。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2003;20(2):127-32. doi: 10.1080/0899022031000105154.
3
Grating orientation task trial numbers for short- and long-term tactile discrimination learning.光栅定向任务试验次数的短期和长期触觉辨别学习。
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Nov;93:195-199. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.08.026. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
4
Assessment of spatial acuity at the fingertip with grating (JVP) domes: validity for use in an elderly population.使用光栅(JVP)圆顶评估指尖的空间敏锐度:在老年人群中的应用有效性。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2000;17(1):61-6. doi: 10.1080/08990220070300.
5
Short-term visual deprivation does not enhance passive tactile spatial acuity.短期视觉剥夺不会提高被动触觉空间敏度。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025277. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
6
Functional consequences of experience-dependent plasticity on tactile perception following perceptual learning.知觉学习后,经验依赖性可塑性对触觉感知的功能影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Sep;44(6):2375-86. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13343. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
7
Hand posture, but not vision of the hand, affects tactile spatial resolution in the grating orientation discrimination task.手的姿势而非手的视觉影响光栅方位辨别任务中的触觉空间分辨率。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Oct;240(10):2715-2723. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06450-3. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
8
Tactile roughness discrimination threshold is unrelated to tactile spatial acuity.触觉粗糙度辨别阈与触觉空间分辨力无关。
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Apr 2;208(2):473-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.017. Epub 2009 Dec 24.
9
A Novel Tactile Function Assessment Using a Miniature Tactile Stimulator.一种新型触觉功能评估器的设计与应用
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Feb 7;23(4):1844. doi: 10.3390/s23041844.
10
Tactile co-activation improves detection of afferent spatial modulation.触觉共同激活可改善传入空间调制的检测。
Exp Brain Res. 2009 Apr;194(3):409-17. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1717-5. Epub 2009 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of sterile glove usage on digital tactile sensitivity using the Grating Orientation Task.使用光栅定向任务评估无菌手套对数字触觉敏感性的影响。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jun 19;11:1401130. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1401130. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Hand posture, but not vision of the hand, affects tactile spatial resolution in the grating orientation discrimination task.手的姿势而非手的视觉影响光栅方位辨别任务中的触觉空间分辨率。
Exp Brain Res. 2022 Oct;240(10):2715-2723. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06450-3. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
2
Evaluation of Cutaneous Spatial Resolution and Pressure Threshold Secondary to Digital Nerve Repair.数字神经修复后继发性皮肤空间分辨率和压力阈值的评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Apr;137(4):1203-1212. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002023.
3
A multi-digit tactile motion stimulator.
一种多位数触觉运动刺激器。
J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Apr 15;226:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.01.021. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
4
The Harvard Beat Assessment Test (H-BAT): a battery for assessing beat perception and production and their dissociation.哈佛节拍评估测试(H-BAT):用于评估节拍感知和产生及其分离的工具。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 26;7:771. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00771. eCollection 2013.
5
Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment.两点方向辨别与传统两点测试在触觉空间敏度评估中的比较。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 13;7:579. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00579. eCollection 2013.
6
Short-term visual deprivation does not enhance passive tactile spatial acuity.短期视觉剥夺不会提高被动触觉空间敏度。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e25277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025277. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
7
A Tactile Automated Passive-Finger Stimulator (TAPS).一种触觉自动被动手指刺激器(TAPS)。
J Vis Exp. 2009 Jun 3(28):1374. doi: 10.3791/1374.
8
Tactile spatial resolution measured manually: a validation study.手动测量的触觉空间分辨率:一项验证研究。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2007 Sep;24(3):111-4. doi: 10.1080/08990220701496639.
9
Tactile spatial acuity differs between fingers: a study comparing two testing paradigms.手指间的触觉空间敏锐度存在差异:一项比较两种测试范式的研究。
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Nov;68(8):1359-62. doi: 10.3758/bf03193734.
10
Age differences in tactile pattern recognition at the fingertip.指尖触觉模式识别中的年龄差异。
Somatosens Mot Res. 2006 Sep-Dec;23(3-4):147-55. doi: 10.1080/08990220601093460.