Fischer Olivia M, Missen Kyle J, Tokuno Craig D, Carpenter Mark G, Adkin Allan L
Department of Kinesiology, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada.
School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 5;14:1179237. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1179237. eCollection 2023.
Postural threat elicits modifications to standing balance. However, the underlying neural mechanism(s) responsible remain unclear. Shifts in attention focus including directing more attention to balance when threatened may contribute to the balance changes. Sample entropy, a measure of postural sway regularity with lower values reflecting less automatic and more conscious control of balance, may support attention to balance as a mechanism to explain threat-induced balance changes. The main objectives were to investigate the effects of postural threat on sample entropy, and the relationships between threat-induced changes in physiological arousal, perceived anxiety, attention focus, sample entropy, and traditional balance measures. A secondary objective was to explore if biological sex influenced these relationships.
Healthy young adults (63 females, 42 males) stood quietly on a force plate without (No Threat) and with (Threat) the expectation of receiving a postural perturbation (i.e., forward/backward support surface translation). Mean electrodermal activity and anterior-posterior centre of pressure (COP) sample entropy, mean position, root mean square, mean power frequency, and power within low (0-0.05 Hz), medium (0.5-1.8 Hz), and high-frequency (1.8-5 Hz) components were calculated for each trial. Perceived anxiety and attention focus to balance, task objectives, threat-related stimuli, self-regulatory strategies, and task-irrelevant information were rated after each trial.
Significant threat effects were observed for all measures, except low-frequency sway. Participants were more physiologically aroused, more anxious, and directed more attention to balance, task objectives, threat-related stimuli, and self-regulatory strategies, and less to task-irrelevant information in the Threat compared to No Threat condition. Participants also increased sample entropy, leaned further forward, and increased the amplitude and frequency of COP displacements, including medium and high-frequency sway, when threatened. Males and females responded in the same way when threatened, except males had significantly larger threat-induced increases in attention to balance and high-frequency sway. A combination of sex and threat-induced changes in physiological arousal, perceived anxiety, and attention focus accounted for threat-induced changes in specific traditional balance measures, but not sample entropy. Increased sample entropy when threatened may reflect a shift to more automatic control. Directing more conscious control to balance when threatened may act to constrain these threat-induced automatic changes to balance.
姿势威胁会引发站立平衡的改变。然而,其潜在的神经机制仍不清楚。注意力焦点的转移,包括在受到威胁时将更多注意力导向平衡,可能有助于平衡的变化。样本熵是一种衡量姿势摆动规律性的指标,其值越低反映对平衡的自动控制越少,有意识控制越多,它可能支持将对平衡的注意力作为解释威胁引起的平衡变化的一种机制。主要目的是研究姿势威胁对样本熵的影响,以及威胁引起的生理唤醒、感知焦虑、注意力焦点、样本熵和传统平衡测量指标之间的关系。次要目的是探讨生物性别是否会影响这些关系。
健康的年轻成年人(63名女性,42名男性)安静地站在测力板上,分别在没有(无威胁)和有(威胁)受到姿势扰动(即前后支撑面平移)预期的情况下进行测试。计算每次试验的平均皮肤电活动、前后压力中心(COP)样本熵、平均位置、均方根、平均功率频率以及低频(0 - 0.05 Hz)、中频(0.5 - 1.8 Hz)和高频(1.8 - 5 Hz)成分内的功率。每次试验后对感知焦虑以及对平衡、任务目标、威胁相关刺激、自我调节策略和任务无关信息的注意力焦点进行评分。
除低频摆动外,所有测量指标均观察到显著的威胁效应。与无威胁条件相比,在威胁条件下,参与者的生理唤醒更强、更焦虑,并且将更多注意力导向平衡、任务目标、威胁相关刺激和自我调节策略,而对任务无关信息的注意力更少。受到威胁时,参与者还增加了样本熵,身体向前倾得更远,并且增加了COP位移的幅度和频率,包括中频和高频摆动。受到威胁时,男性和女性的反应方式相同,只是男性在威胁引起的对平衡的注意力增加和高频摆动方面显著更大。生理唤醒、感知焦虑和注意力焦点的性别与威胁引起的变化共同解释了特定传统平衡测量指标中威胁引起的变化,但不能解释样本熵。受到威胁时样本熵增加可能反映了向更多自动控制的转变。在受到威胁时将更多有意识控制导向平衡可能会起到限制这些威胁引起的平衡自动变化的作用。