Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后慢血流的处理:血流介导的充血随机RAIN-FLOW 研究。

Treatment of Slow-Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-Mediated Hyperemia: The Randomized RAIN-FLOW Study.

机构信息

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d' Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Universitat de Barcelona, L' Hospitalet de Llobregat Barcelona Spain.

Hospital Universtiario La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria-IP (IIS-IP), CIBER-CV Madrid Spain.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):e030285. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030285. Epub 2023 Jun 22.

Abstract

Background ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction complicated with no reflow after primary percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with adverse outcomes. Although several hyperemic drugs have been shown to improve the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow, optimal treatment of no reflow remains unsettled. Saline infusion at 20 mL/min via a dedicated microcatheter causes (flow-mediated) hyperemia. The objective is to compare the efficacy of pharmacologic versus flow-mediated hyperemia in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction complicated with no reflow. Methods and Results In the RAIN-FLOW (Treatment of Slow-Flow After Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Flow-Mediated Hyperemia) study, 67 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction and no reflow were randomized to receive either pharmacologic-mediated hyperemia with intracoronary adenosine or nitroprusside (n=30) versus flow-mediated hyperemia (n=37). The angiographic corrected Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count and the minimal microcirculatory resistance, as assessed with intracoronary pressure-thermistor wire, dedicated microcatheter, and thermodilution techniques, were compared after study interventions. Both Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count(40.2±23.1 versus 39.2±20.7; =0.858) and minimal microcirculatory resistance (753.6±661.5 versus 993.3±740.8 Wood units; =0.174) were similar between groups. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 3 flow was observed in 26.7% versus 27.0% (=0.899). Flow-mediated hyperemia showed 2 different thermodilution patterns during saline infusion indicative of the severity of the no reflow phenomenon. In-hospital death and nonfatal heart failure were observed in 10.4% and 26.9%, respectively. Conclusions Both treatments showed similar (and limited) efficacy restoring coronary flow. Flow-mediated hyperemia with thermodilution pattern assessment allowed the simultaneous characterization of the no reflow degree and response to hyperemia. No reflow was associated with a high rate of adverse outcomes. Further research is warranted to prevent and to treat no reflow in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04685941.

摘要

背景 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后并发 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死无复流与不良预后相关。虽然几种扩血管药物已被证明可改善心肌梗死溶栓血流,但无复流的最佳治疗方法仍未确定。通过专用微导管以 20ml/min 的速度输注盐水可引起(血流介导的)充血。目的是比较药物介导充血与血流介导充血治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死并发无复流的疗效。

方法和结果 在 RAIN-FLOW(通过血流介导充血治疗直接 PCI 后慢血流)研究中,67 例 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死并发无复流的患者被随机分为接受冠状动脉内腺苷或硝普钠(n=30)药物介导充血与血流介导充血(n=37)。研究干预后,比较冠状动脉造影校正的心肌梗死溶栓血流帧数(Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count)和最小微血管阻力(通过冠状动脉内压力热敏电阻线、专用微导管和热稀释技术评估)。两组的 Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction frame count(40.2±23.1 比 39.2±20.7;=0.858)和最小微血管阻力(753.6±661.5 比 993.3±740.8 Wood 单位;=0.174)相似。Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 3 级血流分别为 26.7%和 27.0%(=0.899)。血流介导充血在盐水输注期间显示出 2 种不同的热稀释模式,提示无复流现象的严重程度。住院期间死亡和非致命性心力衰竭的发生率分别为 10.4%和 26.9%。

结论 两种治疗方法均显示出相似(且有限)的恢复冠状动脉血流的疗效。血流介导充血并结合热稀释模式评估可同时对无复流程度和充血反应进行特征描述。无复流与不良结局发生率高相关。需要进一步研究以预防和治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的无复流。

注册网址

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT04685941。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bd45/10356082/11f2295d7b96/JAH3-12-e030285-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验