College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824; Riverview LLP, Morris, MN 56267.
Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108.
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Aug;106(8):5687-5695. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22845. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
Blanket dry cow therapy (DCT) is a major contributor to overall antibiotic usage on dairy farms in the United States. With low prevalence of intramammary infections at dry-off in US herds today, alternative DCT approaches have been the focus of much research. We hypothesized that complete cessation of DCT [i.e., use of internal teat sealants (ITS) only at dry-off] could be a practical alternative to blanket DCT in well-managed herds. The objective of this negatively controlled clinical trial was to determine the effects of DCT on clinical mastitis (CM) and removal from the herd during the dry period and the first 200 d of the subsequent lactation in multiparous dairy cows treated with only ITS at dry-off. As a secondary objective, we conducted exploratory analysis to identify subpopulations in the herd (based on parity, previous CM history, and dry-period length) where DCT would not affect postcalving udder health, to generate hypotheses about potential alternative selective DCT programs. The study was conducted in a commercial dairy herd in South Dakota from June 2020 to January 2021. Dry-off sessions (n = 43) were scheduled such that all cows at a given session were dried off using ITS alone (ITS only, n = 20 sessions, n = 1,108 cows) or an intramammary DCT product containing 500 mg of cloxacillin (Dry-Clox, Boehringer Ingelheim) followed by ITS (ITS+ABX, n = 23 sessions, n = 1,331 cows). Culling and CM events were recorded by farm workers who were blinded to the treatment status of cows. Hazard ratios (HR) for the effects of the treatment group on CM and removal from the herd were estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards, adjusting for the clustered treatment allocation strategy. Risk of removal from the herd during the dry period was lower in ITS+ABX than ITS-only cows (1.1 vs. 2.7%; HR = 0.45; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.81). Risk of removal from the herd during the first 200 d of lactation was similar in ITS+ABX and ITS-only cows (17.3 vs. 18.0%; HR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.18). Risk of CM during the first 200 d of lactation was lower in ITS+ABX cows (6.9%; HR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.76) compared with ITS-only cows (13.4%). The beneficial effects of DCT on CM and removal from the herd were consistently observed across strata of parity, previous CM history, and dry-period length, indicating that no subpopulations could be identified to withhold DCT. The findings from this study indicate that the omission of DCT from the dry-off procedure, when udder health is not taken into consideration, in multiparous cows can have a negative effect on cow health and welfare. Findings from previous research suggest that culture- or algorithm-guided selective dry cow therapy are likely to be safer approaches to improving antibiotic stewardship.
干奶期普遍采用抗生素疗法(DCT)是美国奶牛场抗生素使用量居高不下的主要原因。目前美国牛群干奶期的隐性乳房炎发病率较低,因此,替代 DCT 的方法一直是许多研究的重点。我们假设,完全停止 DCT[即用内部乳头密封剂(ITS)代替 DCT]在管理良好的牛群中可能是一种替代传统 DCT 的实用方法。本阴性对照临床试验的目的是确定仅在干奶期使用 ITS 的情况下,DCT 对奶牛干奶期和随后泌乳期第 200 天临床乳腺炎(CM)和淘汰率的影响。作为次要目标,我们进行了探索性分析,以确定牛群中的亚群(基于胎次、先前 CM 史和干奶期长度),在这些亚群中,DCT 不会影响产后乳房健康,从而提出关于潜在替代选择性 DCT 方案的假设。该研究于 2020 年 6 月至 2021 年 1 月在南达科他州的一家商业奶牛场进行。干奶期会议(n=43)的安排方式是,在同一会议中,所有奶牛都单独使用 ITS(ITS 组,n=20 个会议,n=1108 头奶牛)或含有 500 毫克氯唑西林的 DCT 产品(Boehringer Ingelheim 的 Dry-Clox)进行干奶,然后再使用 ITS(ITS+ABX 组,n=23 个会议,n=1331 头奶牛)。农场工人记录淘汰和 CM 事件,他们对奶牛的治疗状况一无所知。使用多变量 Cox 比例风险模型估计处理组对 CM 和淘汰的影响,调整了聚类处理分配策略。与仅使用 ITS 的奶牛相比,ITS+ABX 组的干奶期淘汰率较低(1.1%比 2.7%;HR=0.45;95%CI:0.25 至 0.81)。ITS+ABX 和 ITS 组的干奶期第 200 天淘汰率相似(17.3%比 18.0%;HR=0.98;95%CI:0.82 至 1.18)。ITS+ABX 组的泌乳期第 200 天 CM 风险低于 ITS 组(6.9%;HR=0.56;95%CI:0.41 至 0.76)。与仅使用 ITS 的奶牛相比,DCT 对 CM 和淘汰的有益影响在胎次、先前 CM 史和干奶期长度的各个亚层中均一致观察到,这表明不能确定任何亚群可以不使用 DCT。本研究结果表明,在不考虑乳房健康的情况下,在多胎奶牛中从干奶期程序中省略 DCT,可能会对奶牛的健康和福利产生负面影响。先前的研究结果表明,基于培养或算法的选择性干奶期治疗可能是改善抗生素管理的更安全方法。