Reconstructive Surgery and Regenerative Medicine Research Centre (ReconRegen), Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK; Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
Reconstructive Surgery and Regenerative Medicine Research Centre (ReconRegen), Institute of Life Sciences, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea, UK; Welsh Centre for Burns and Plastic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 Sep;84:250-257. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.04.052. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, there was concern that virtual or remote multidisciplinary teams (MDT) meetings represented a niche concept that was unlikely to replace traditional face-to-face meetings in the management of cancer. However, the sudden shift to virtual meetings during COVID-19 has been one of the most dramatic changes since the inception of the MDT. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of virtual skin MDTs since the move to virtual meetings.
A cross-sectional survey was sent to all Specialist Skin Cancer MDTs (SSMDTs) and the British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgeons Skin Oncology Special Interest and Advisory Group.
There were 68 responses (55.3% response rate) from 36 SSMDTs in the UK. Respondents felt communication, chairing, and decision-making were similar in virtual and in-person MDTs, but the team working was worse in virtual meetings. Recruitment, data security, and patient confidentiality were maintained in virtual MDTs. Most preferred a hybrid format for future MDTs, with the option to attend virtually. Recommendations for improvement included better connectivity, IT support, training, and staff integration.
The virtual MDT is here to stay. We highlight the strengths and weaknesses of remote virtual skin MDTs. It is key that we look at ways to retain team working to ensure that the collegiate nature of MDT working, and therefore treatment options for patients, are not lost in this transformation in MDT delivery.
在 COVID-19 大流行之前,人们担心虚拟或远程多学科团队 (MDT) 会议代表了一种不太可能取代癌症管理中传统面对面会议的利基概念。然而,在 COVID-19 期间突然转向虚拟会议,这是 MDT 成立以来最显著的变化之一。本研究旨在调查自转为虚拟会议以来虚拟皮肤 MDT 的效果。
向所有专科皮肤癌 MDT(SSMDT)和英国整形、重建和美容外科医师协会皮肤肿瘤学特别兴趣和咨询小组发送了一份横断面调查。
英国 36 个 SSMDT 中有 68 个(55.3%的回复率)做出了回应。受访者认为虚拟和面对面 MDT 中的沟通、主持和决策相似,但团队合作在虚拟会议中更差。虚拟 MDT 中保留了招募、数据安全和患者保密性。大多数人更喜欢未来 MDT 的混合模式,可选择虚拟参加。改进建议包括更好的连接性、IT 支持、培训和员工整合。
虚拟 MDT 已经存在。我们强调了远程虚拟皮肤 MDT 的优缺点。关键是我们要寻找方法来保持团队合作,以确保 MDT 工作的协作性质,以及因此患者的治疗选择,不会在 MDT 交付的这种转变中丢失。