Psychology Department, Stanford University.
Psychology Department, Yale University.
Dev Psychol. 2023 Aug;59(8):1511-1518. doi: 10.1037/dev0001573. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
As adults, we intuitively understand how others' goals influence their information-seeking preferences. For example, you might recommend a dense book full of mechanistic details to someone trying to learn about a topic in-depth, but a more lighthearted book filled with surprising stories to someone seeking entertainment. Moreover, you might do this with confidence despite knowing few details about either book. Even though we offer or receive such recommendations frequently as adults, we know little about how the ability to evaluate and recommend information sources to others develops. Two studies examined how children (6-9 years, Eastern U.S. residents, = 311) and adults (U.S. residents, = 180) select mechanistic and entertaining information sources for others depending on their goals. Participants recommended books containing mechanistic information to agents who wanted to learn and entertaining information to agents who wanted to have fun. In contrast to adults who strongly favored entertaining books, children recommended both kinds of books equally to a generally curious agent. These results suggest children can infer others' information-seeking preferences based on their goals and recommend appropriate information sources to satisfy those goals despite possessing little topical knowledge themselves. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
作为成年人,我们本能地理解他人的目标如何影响他们的信息搜索偏好。例如,你可能会向一个试图深入了解某个主题的人推荐一本充满机械细节的密集书籍,但会向一个寻求娱乐的人推荐一本充满惊喜故事的轻松书籍。此外,尽管你对这两本书的细节知之甚少,但你可能会充满信心地这样做。尽管我们作为成年人经常提供或接受这样的建议,但我们对评估和向他人推荐信息源的能力是如何发展的知之甚少。两项研究考察了儿童(6-9 岁,美国东部居民,=311)和成年人(美国居民,=180)如何根据目标为他人选择机械和娱乐信息源。参与者向想要学习的代理人推荐包含机械信息的书籍,向想要娱乐的代理人推荐娱乐信息的书籍。与强烈倾向于娱乐书籍的成年人不同,儿童向一个普遍好奇的代理人推荐了两种类型的书籍。这些结果表明,尽管儿童本身缺乏主题知识,但他们可以根据目标推断他人的信息搜索偏好,并推荐合适的信息源来满足这些目标。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。