Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Van Yüzüncü Yıl University, Van, Turkey.
Lasers Med Sci. 2023 Jun 26;38(1):148. doi: 10.1007/s10103-023-03816-z.
In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the smear and debris removal efficiency of laser and ultrasonic irrigation activation methods in traditional and conservative endodontic access cavity preparations. 60 freshly extracted human mandibular molar teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the access cavity preparation (n = 30): Traditional endodontic access cavities (TEC) and Conservative endodontic access cavity (CEC). After the access cavity preparation, the mesiobuccal root canals were prepared to 35/0.4 with the VDW Rotate file system. Teeth with completed root canal preparation were randomly divided into 3 subgroups according to the final irrigation activation protocol (n = 30): Conventional needle irrigation, passive ultrasonic activation and laser activation. The crowns of the teeth were removed and the mesiobuccal roots were divided longitudinally into two halves, mesial and distal. Samples were scanned with scanning electron microscopy. Photomicrographs in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of each specimen were taken at a magnification of 200 for debris and 1000 for evaluation of the smear layer. Data were analysed using the three-way Robust Anova test and Bonferroni test.The effect of access cavity design on remaining smear (p = 0.057) and debris (p = 0.5) was not statistically significant. The effect of the interaction of access cavity and irrigation activation on the remaining smear and debris was not statistically significant (p = 0.556, p = 0.333). Significantly fewer smears were detected in the laser activation group than in the ultrasonic activation and control groups. Conservative access cavities did not differ from conventional access cavities in terms of debris and smear.
在这项研究中,旨在评估激光和超声冲洗激活方法在传统和保守牙髓腔预备中的清除玷污层和碎屑的效率。60 颗新鲜离体下颌第一磨牙随机分为 2 组,根据牙髓腔预备方法(n=30):传统牙髓腔预备(TEC)和保守牙髓腔预备(CEC)。预备完成后,使用 VDW Rotate 锉预备近中颊根管至 35/0.4。根据最终冲洗激活方案将完成根管预备的牙齿随机分为 3 个亚组(n=30):常规注射器冲洗、被动超声激活和激光激活。去除牙冠,将近中颊根纵向分为近中、远中两半。使用扫描电子显微镜对样本进行扫描。在每个样本的冠、中、根尖三分之一处,以 200 倍放大倍数拍摄碎屑的照片,以 1000 倍放大倍数评价玷污层。采用三向稳健方差分析和 Bonferroni 检验对数据进行分析。牙髓腔设计对残留玷污层(p=0.057)和碎屑(p=0.5)的影响无统计学意义。牙髓腔和冲洗激活的相互作用对残留玷污层和碎屑的影响无统计学意义(p=0.556,p=0.333)。与超声激活和对照组相比,激光激活组的玷污层明显较少。保守型髓腔与传统髓腔相比,在碎屑和玷污层方面无差异。