Suppr超能文献

一项评价个体化顺势疗法药物治疗糖尿病前期疗效的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照临床试验。

A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in Pre-diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tata Memorial Center, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Department of Materia Medica, Mahesh Bhattacharyya Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Government of West Bengal, Howrah, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Homeopathy. 2024 May;113(2):67-79. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769506. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pre-diabetes (PD) contributes importantly to the disease burden worldwide and is a precursor to stroke, cardiovascular diseases, as well as type-2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE

In this project, the efficacy of individualized homeopathic medicines (IHMs) was explored against placebos in the treatment of PD.

METHODS

A 6-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the outpatient departments of a homeopathic medical college and hospital in India. Sixty participants with PD were randomized to receive either IHMs ( = 30) or identical-looking placebos ( = 30). Concomitant care measures were advised to both groups of participants in terms of dietary advice, yoga, meditation and exercise. The primary outcome measures were fasting blood sugar (FBS) and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); the secondary outcome was the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R) score. All the outcomes were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. Inter-group differences and effect sizes (Cohen's ) were calculated using two-way repeated measures analysis of variance models after adjusting baseline differences using analysis of co-variance on the intention-to-treat data.

RESULTS

Between-group differences for FBS were statistically significant, favoring IHMs against placebos (  = 7.798,  = 0.007), but not for OGTT (  = 1.691,  = 0.199). The secondary outcome, DSC-R total score, favoring IHMs significantly compared with placebos (  = 15.752,  < 0.001). , and were the most frequently prescribed medicines. No harm or serious adverse events were recorded from either of the participant groups.

CONCLUSION

IHMs produced significantly better results than placebos in FBS and in DSC-R scores but not in OGTT. Independent replications with larger sample sizes are warranted to substantiate the findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CTRI/2019/10/021711.

摘要

背景

前驱糖尿病(PD)在全球疾病负担中占有重要地位,是中风、心血管疾病以及 2 型糖尿病的前兆。

目的

本项目旨在探讨个体化顺势疗法药物(IHMs)在治疗 PD 中的疗效是否优于安慰剂。

方法

在印度一所顺势疗法医学院和医院的门诊部进行了一项为期 6 个月的、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。将 60 名前驱糖尿病患者随机分为接受 IHMs(n=30)或外观相同的安慰剂(n=30)的两组。两组患者均接受了饮食建议、瑜伽、冥想和运动等伴随护理措施。主要结局测量指标为空腹血糖(FBS)和口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT);次要结局是糖尿病症状清单修订版(DSC-R)评分。所有结局均在基线时以及治疗 3 个月和 6 个月时进行测量。采用双向重复测量方差分析模型计算组间差异和效应大小(Cohen's ),并使用协方差分析对意向治疗数据进行调整以消除基线差异。

结果

FBS 组间差异具有统计学意义,IHMs 优于安慰剂(  =7.798,  =0.007),但 OGTT 无显著差异(  =1.691,  =0.199)。次要结局,DSC-R 总分,IHMs 明显优于安慰剂(  =15.752,  <0.001)。 、 和 是最常开的药物。两组患者均未记录到任何伤害或严重不良事件。

结论

IHMs 在 FBS 和 DSC-R 评分方面的疗效明显优于安慰剂,但在 OGTT 方面无显著差异。需要更大样本量的独立复制来证实这些发现。

临床试验注册

CTRI/2019/10/021711。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验