Au Ka Lai K, Knitter Julie L, Morrow-McGinty Susan, Campos Talita C, Carmel Jason B, Friel Kathleen M
Blythedale Children's Hospital, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA.
School of Nursing, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;13(6):490. doi: 10.3390/bs13060490.
Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and bimanual therapy (BT) are among the most effective hand therapies for children with unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP). Since they train different aspects of hand use, they likely have synergistic effects. The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of different combinations of mCIMT and BT in an intensive occupational therapy program for children with uCP. Children ( = 35) participated in intensive modified CIMT (mCIMT) and BT, 6 weeks, 5 days/week, 6 h/day. During the first 2 weeks, children wore a mitt over the less-affected hand and engaged in functional and play activities with the affected hand. Starting in week 3, bimanual play and functional activities were added progressively, 1 hour/week. This intervention was compared to two different schedules of block interventions: (1) 3 weeks of mCIMT followed by 3 weeks of BT, and (2) 3 weeks of BT followed by 3 weeks of mCIMT. Hand function was tested before, after, and two months after therapy with the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA), Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI), and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). All three groups of children improved in functional independence (PEDI; < 0.031), goal performance (COPM Performance; < 0.0001) and satisfaction (COPM Satisfaction; < 0.0001), which persisted two months post-intervention. All groups showed similar amounts of improvement, indicating that the delivery schedule for mCIMT and BT does not significantly impact the outcomes.
强制性诱导运动疗法(CIMT)和双手疗法(BT)是治疗单侧脑瘫(uCP)儿童最有效的手部疗法。由于它们训练手部使用的不同方面,可能具有协同作用。本研究的目的是在针对uCP儿童的强化职业治疗项目中,检验改良CIMT(mCIMT)和BT不同组合的疗效。35名儿童参加了强化改良CIMT和BT,为期6周,每周5天,每天6小时。在最初的2周内,儿童在受影响较小的手上戴一个手套,并使用受影响的手进行功能和游戏活动。从第3周开始,逐渐增加双手游戏和功能活动,每周1小时。将这种干预与两种不同的分组干预方案进行比较:(1)3周的mCIMT,然后是3周的BT;(2)3周的BT,然后是3周的mCIMT。在治疗前、治疗后以及治疗后两个月,使用辅助手评估(AHA)、儿童残疾评估量表(PEDI)和加拿大职业表现测量量表(COPM)对手功能进行测试。所有三组儿童在功能独立性(PEDI;P<0.031)、目标完成情况(COPM表现;P<0.0001)和满意度(COPM满意度;P<0.0001)方面均有改善,且在干预后两个月仍持续存在。所有组的改善程度相似,表明mCIMT和BT的实施顺序对结果没有显著影响。