Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Gangneung Asan Hospital, 38 Bangdong-gil, Gangneung 25440, Republic of Korea.
Department of Radiology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 5;59(6):1089. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061089.
: The novel double-pigtail catheter (DPC) has an additional pigtail coiling at the mid-shaft with multiple centripetal side holes. The present study aimed to investigate the advantages and efficacy of DPC in overcoming the complications of conventional single-pigtail catheters (SPC) used to drain pleural effusion. : Between July 2018 and December 2019, 382 pleural effusion drainage procedures were reviewed retrospectively (DPC, = 156; SPC without multiple side holes, = 110; SPC with multiple side holes (SPC + M), = 116). All patients showed shifting pleural effusions in the decubitus view of the chest radiography. All catheters were 10.2 Fr in diameter. One interventional radiologist performed all procedures and used the same anchoring technique. Complications (dysfunctional retraction, complete dislodgement, blockage, and atraumatic pneumothorax) were compared among the catheters using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Clinical success was defined as an improvement in pleural effusion within three days without additional procedures. Survival analysis was performed to calculate the indwelling time. : The dysfunctional retraction rate of DPC was significantly lower than that of the other catheters ( < 0.001). Complete dislodgement did not occur in any of the DPC cases. The clinical success rate of DPC (90.1%) was the highest. The estimated indwelling times were nine (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.3-10.7), eight (95% CI: 6.6-9.4), and seven (95% CI: 6.3-7.7) days for SPC, SPC + M, and DPC, respectively, with DPC showing a significant difference ( < 0.05). : DPC had a lower dysfunctional retraction rate compared to conventional drainage catheters. Furthermore, DPC was efficient for pleural effusion drainage with a shorter indwelling time.
新型双猪尾导管(DPC)在中轴处有额外的猪尾卷曲,并带有多个向心侧孔。本研究旨在探讨 DPC 克服常规单猪尾导管(SPC)引流胸腔积液并发症的优势和疗效。
在 2018 年 7 月至 2019 年 12 月期间,回顾性分析了 382 例胸腔积液引流术(DPC,n=156;无多个侧孔的 SPC,n=110;有多个侧孔的 SPC(SPC+M),n=116)。所有患者在胸部 X 线侧卧位片上均显示移位性胸腔积液。所有导管直径均为 10.2Fr。一位介入放射科医生进行了所有操作,并使用相同的锚定技术。采用卡方检验和 Fisher 精确检验比较导管的并发症(功能障碍性回缩、完全移位、阻塞和非创伤性气胸)。将三天内胸腔积液改善且无需进一步处理的病例定义为临床成功。生存分析用于计算留置时间。
DPC 的功能障碍性回缩率明显低于其他导管(<0.001)。DPC 组无完全移位发生。DPC 的临床成功率(90.1%)最高。SPC、SPC+M 和 DPC 的估计留置时间分别为 9(95%置信区间(CI):7.3-10.7)、8(95% CI:6.6-9.4)和 7(95% CI:6.3-7.7)天,DPC 与其他两组比较差异有统计学意义(<0.05)。
与传统引流导管相比,DPC 的功能障碍性回缩率较低。此外,DPC 可有效引流胸腔积液,留置时间较短。