Suppr超能文献

股骨转子间骨折的髓内钉固定:术后螺旋刀片的移位是否比拉力螺钉更多?一项随机对照试验。

Intramedullary Femur Nailing in Intertrochanteric Fractures: Postoperatively Do Helical Blades Migrate More Than Lag Screws? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Upadhayay Arpan, Mittal Samarth, Kumar Atin, Trikha Vivek

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, JPN Apex, Trauma Centre, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029 India.

Department of Radiology, JPN Apex, Trauma Centre, AIIMS, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, 110029 India.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2023 Apr 29;57(7):1054-1062. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00892-9. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial to test functional outcomes between a single lag screw and helical blade nails in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures.

METHODS

72 patients with intertrochanteric fractures between March 2019 to November 2020 were randomized into two groups and treated with a lag screw or a helical blade nail. Intraoperative parameters such as operative time, blood loss, and radiation exposure were calculated. Postoperatively, tip apex distance, neck length, neck-shaft angle, lateral impingement of implant, union rate, and the functional outcomes were measured at the end of 6 month follow-up period.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in tip apex distance ( = 0.03) and neck length(p-0.04) with significant lateral impingement of the implant ( = 0.04) in the helical blade group compared to the lag screw group. The functional outcome calculated using the modified Harris Hip score & Parker and Palmer mobility score, at the end of 6 months, had no significant difference between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Both lag screw and helical blade devices can be used to successfully treat these fractures, although there is greater medial migration in the helical blade as compared to the lag screw.

摘要

目的

这是一项前瞻性随机对照试验,旨在测试单枚拉力螺钉与螺旋刀片式髓内钉治疗股骨转子间骨折的功能结果。

方法

将2019年3月至2020年11月期间的72例股骨转子间骨折患者随机分为两组,分别采用拉力螺钉或螺旋刀片式髓内钉治疗。计算手术时间、失血量和辐射暴露等术中参数。术后,在6个月随访期末测量尖顶距、颈长、颈干角、植入物外侧撞击、愈合率和功能结果。

结果

与拉力螺钉组相比,螺旋刀片组的尖顶距(p=0.03)和颈长(p=0.04)显著降低,植入物外侧撞击显著(p=0.04)。使用改良Harris髋关节评分和Parker及Palmer活动度评分计算的6个月末功能结果,两组间无显著差异。

结论

拉力螺钉和螺旋刀片装置均可成功治疗这些骨折,尽管与拉力螺钉相比,螺旋刀片的内侧移位更大。

相似文献

2
Cephalomedullary helical blade is independently associated with less collapse in intertrochanteric femur fractures than lag screws.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Oct;31(7):1421-1425. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-02875-8. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
4
Implant cut-out following cephalomedullary nailing of intertrochanteric femur fractures: Are helical blades to blame?
Injury. 2019 Apr;50(4):926-930. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.02.015. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
7
No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Dec;32(8):1617-1625. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03124-8. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
8
Does Computer-assisted Surgery Improve Lag Screw Placement During Cephalomedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2132-2144. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001306.

本文引用的文献

1
No difference between lag screw and helical blade for cephalomedullary nail cut-out a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Dec;32(8):1617-1625. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03124-8. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture.
Injury. 2018 Aug;49(8):1458-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验