Biomedical Sciences Institute Abel Salazar, Portugal and Hospital of Braga, Sete Fontes - São Victor, 4710-243 Braga, Portugal.
Hospital of Braga, Sete Fontes - São Victor, 4710-243 Braga, Portugal.
Midwifery. 2023 Sep;124:103763. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103763. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of perineal massage and warm compresses technique on the perineum integrity during second stage of labor.
A single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 1st, 2019, and December 31st, 2020, at Hospital of Braga.
Women with 18 years or older, between 37 weeks and 41 weeks pregnant, in whom a vaginal birth of a fetus in the cephalic presentation was planned were recruited. Eight hundred forty-eight women were randomly assigned (Perineal massage and warm compresses group, n = 424 and control group, n = 424), and 800 women, both perineal massage and warm compresses group (n = 400) and control group (n = 400) were included in the strict per protocol analysis.
In the perineal massage and warm compresses group, women received perineal massage and warm compresses and in the control group, women received hands-on technique.
The incidence of intact perineum was significantly higher in the perineal massage and warm compresses group [perineal massage and warm compresses group: 47% vs control group: 26.3%; OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.86-3.45, p<0.001], whereas second-degree tears and episiotomy rate were significantly lower in this group [perineal massage and warm compresses group: 7.2% vs control group: 12.3%; OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.17-3.29, p = 0.010 and perineal massage and warm compresses group: 9.5% vs control group: 28.5%; OR 3.478, 95% CI 2.236-5.409, p<0.001, respectively]. Also, obstetric anal sphincter injury with and without episiotomy and second-degree tears with episiotomy were significantly lower in the perineal massage and warm compresses group [perineal massage and warm compresses group: 0.5% vs control group: 2.3%; OR 5.404, 95% CI 1.077-27.126, p = 0.040 and perineal massage and warm compresses group: 0.3% vs control group: 1.8%; OR 9.253, 95% CI 1.083-79.015, p = 0.042, respectively].
The perineal massage and warm compresses technique increased the incidence of intact perineum and reduced the incidence of second-degree tear, episiotomy and obstetric anal sphincter injury.
Perineal massage and warm compresses technique is feasible, inexpensive and reproductible. Therefore, this technique should be taught and trained to midwives students and midwives team. Thus, women should have this information and have the option to decide whether they want to receive the perineal massage and warm compresses technique in the second stage of labor.
本研究旨在评估会阴按摩和热敷技术对第二产程会阴完整性的影响。
这是一项于 2019 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日在布拉加医院进行的单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验。
招募了年龄在 18 岁及以上、怀孕 37 周至 41 周、计划阴道分娩头位胎儿的女性。848 名女性被随机分配(会阴按摩和热敷组,n=424;对照组,n=424),800 名女性(会阴按摩和热敷组,n=400;对照组,n=400)被纳入严格的方案分析。
会阴按摩和热敷组的女性接受会阴按摩和热敷,对照组的女性接受手法操作。
会阴按摩和热敷组的完整会阴发生率显著更高(会阴按摩和热敷组:47%vs对照组:26.3%;OR 2.53,95%CI 1.86-3.45,p<0.001),而第二度撕裂和会阴切开术的发生率在该组显著较低(会阴按摩和热敷组:7.2%vs对照组:12.3%;OR 1.96,95%CI 1.17-3.29,p=0.010 和会阴按摩和热敷组:9.5%vs对照组:28.5%;OR 3.478,95%CI 2.236-5.409,p<0.001)。此外,会阴按摩和热敷组的产科肛门括约肌损伤伴或不伴会阴切开术和第二度撕裂伴会阴切开术的发生率也显著较低(会阴按摩和热敷组:0.5%vs对照组:2.3%;OR 5.404,95%CI 1.077-27.126,p=0.040 和会阴按摩和热敷组:0.3%vs对照组:1.8%;OR 9.253,95%CI 1.083-79.015,p=0.042)。
会阴按摩和热敷技术增加了完整会阴的发生率,并降低了第二度撕裂、会阴切开术和产科肛门括约肌损伤的发生率。
会阴按摩和热敷技术是可行的、经济的且可复制的。因此,应该向助产士学生和助产士团队教授和培训这种技术。这样,女性就应该了解这些信息,并可以选择是否在第二产程中接受会阴按摩和热敷技术。