Suppr超能文献

早产儿呼吸窘迫银曼-安德森指数的评定者间信度。

Inter-rater reliability of the Silverman and Andersen index-a measure of respiratory distress in preterm infants.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, St. Olavs Hospital Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 30;18(6):e0286655. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286655. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are various methods of respiratory support available to optimize respiratory function in preterm infants. Respiratory scoring tools might provide information on which method to choose and the level and duration of support needed. Before implementing a respiratory scoring tool in our clinical practice, we aimed to test the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Silverman and Andersen index (SA index) among neonatologists and nurses when applied to preterm infants on respiratory support. We also examined the association between the SA index and the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi signals).

METHODS

This was a multicenter study including three newborn intensive care units in Norway. Four neonatologists and 10 nurses applied the SA index when assessing 80 videos of 44 preterm infants on High Flow Nasal Cannula, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist. The inter- and intra-rater reliability for the sum scores were measured by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), and Kendall's W was used to assess the degree of agreement for each item. We quantified the association between the Edi signals and the SA index scores by the Spearman's correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

We found poor inter-rater reliability with an ICC for absolute agreement of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.20 to 0.53). There was fair agreement measuring each item separately for upper chest movements (Kendall's W 0.30), and moderate for lower chest movements (0.43) and xiphoid retractions (0.44). Expiratory grunting showed substantial agreement (0.67). The intra-rater reliability was good (ICC for absolute agreement 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68 to 0.84). We found a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.468, p = 0.028) between the maximum inspiratory diaphragm activity (Edi peak) and the mean inspiratory SA index scores.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed poor inter-rater and good intra-rater reliability of the SA index when nurses and neonatologists assessed videos of preterm infants on various types of respiratory support. Edi peak and SA index had a moderate positive correlation. Formal training might be essential to improve the inter-rater reliability.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered 26th June 2017, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03199898.

摘要

背景

有多种呼吸支持方法可用于优化早产儿的呼吸功能。呼吸评分工具可以提供有关选择哪种方法以及所需支持的水平和持续时间的信息。在将呼吸评分工具应用于我们的临床实践之前,我们旨在测试新生儿科医生和护士在对接受呼吸支持的早产儿进行评估时,Silverman 和 Andersen 指数(SA 指数)的组内和组间可靠性。我们还研究了 SA 指数与膈肌电活动(Edi 信号)之间的关联。

方法

这是一项多中心研究,包括挪威的三个新生儿重症监护病房。四名新生儿科医生和十名护士在对 44 名接受高流量鼻导管、持续气道正压通气和神经调节通气辅助治疗的早产儿的 80 个视频进行评估时应用了 SA 指数。使用组内相关系数(ICC)测量总和得分的组内和组间可靠性,Kendall's W 用于评估每个项目的一致性程度。我们通过 Spearman 相关系数量化了 Edi 信号与 SA 指数得分之间的关联。

结果

我们发现绝对一致性的组间可靠性较差,ICC 为 0.34(95%CI:0.20 至 0.53)。分别测量上胸部运动(Kendall's W 0.30)、下胸部运动(0.43)和剑突回缩(0.44)的每个项目的一致性良好。呼气时呼噜声的一致性较好(0.67)。组内可靠性良好(绝对一致性 ICC 为 0.77;95%CI:0.68 至 0.84)。我们发现最大吸气膈肌活动(Edi 峰值)与平均吸气 SA 指数得分之间存在中度正相关(r = 0.468,p = 0.028)。

结论

当护士和新生儿科医生对接受各种类型呼吸支持的早产儿的视频进行评估时,我们的研究表明 SA 指数的组间和组内可靠性较差。Edi 峰值和 SA 指数之间存在中度正相关。正式培训可能对于提高组间可靠性至关重要。

试验注册

2017 年 6 月 26 日注册,ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03199898。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10313036/3075b60b051b/pone.0286655.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验