Suppr超能文献

[骨折相关感染(FRI)的发病率、诊断及危险因素:一级创伤中心的3年经验]

[Incidence, Diagnosis and Risk Factors for Fracture-Related Infection (FRI): 3-Year Experience of Level I Trauma Centre].

作者信息

Řimsa J, Doležalová Hrubá M, Urban J, Peml M, Holub K, Kloub M

机构信息

Oddělení úrazové a plastické chirurgie Nemocnice České Budějovice.

出版信息

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023;90(3):211-218.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The study aims to determine the incidence of fracture-related infection (hereinafter referred to as the FRI) at a Level I trauma centre over a three-year period. It also aimed to determine the risk factors, to observe confirmatory and suggestive criteria in line with the applicable recommendations, and to evaluate the bacterial spectrum in a diagnosed FRI. MATERIAL AND METHODS It is a retrospective-prospective study carried out through studying the documentation. The study included all patients diagnosed with FRI and treated between 2019 and 2021, except for the patients with hand fractures since minor phalangeal fractures of the fingers were largely treated by the outpatient department, no osteosynthesis was performed in the operating room, and these patients were not followed up at our department. RESULTS The FRI incidence was 2.33% of all osteosyntheses performed at the Level 1 trauma centre in the period 2019-2021. The FRI was most often caused by pyogenic cocci agents and the FRI developed most frequently within 6 months after osteosynthesis. The site at risk was the lower limb region. The FRI incidence was most often indicated by suggestive clinical criteria (redness, secretion, pain) and radiological criteria (delayed healing, non-union). Overall, 42.19% of treated nonunions were later diagnosed as FRI. At the time of FRI diagnosis, the CRP values were normal in 21.7% of patients. DISCUSSION The FRI incidence rate in 2019-2021 was 2.33%, which corresponds with the values reported in other papers focusing on the incidence of infectious complications after osteosynthesis. Fang and Depypere reported 1-2% of infectious complications. The most common risk factors are open fractures, which account for 20.16% in our cohort. Ktistakis and Depypere describe the incidence of osteomyelitis in 30% of treated open fractures. In our cohort, the incidence of FRI was significantly higher in lower limb fractures. Bezstarosti, Wang and Pesch published similar results, with some deviations. The time from osteosynthesis to final FRI diagnosis varied from a few weeks to several years. In more than half of the patients the FRI developed within 6 months after performed osteosynthesis. Metsemakers and Fang refer to the very same trend. The CRP levels in the study population varied a lot. Xing-qi Zhao describes CRP as a less sensitive (sensitivity 65.6%) but more specific marker (specificity 75.4%). According to the available literature, the most common agents causing infectious complications of osteosynthesis are gram-positive cocci, S. aureus in particular. In our study, G+ pyogenic cocci were clearly the most commonly detected, which is consistent with the results of studies by Fang and Depypere, focused on the incidence of infectious complications. The most common FRI clinical manifestations included wound secretion, redness, swelling and pain. Furthermore, suggestive radiological criteria, especially delayed healing and non-union also indicated the FRI occurrence. According to Fang, the most common clinical manifestations of infectious complications include pain, swelling, redness and wound dehiscence. Fang reports that the most common radiologic findings are the periosteal reaction, loosening of the implant and delayed healing or non-union, which is consistent with our cohort. In the cohort of non-unions surgically treated at our department, FRI was subsequently confirmed in 42.19% of cases. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of FRI at Level 1 trauma centre was 2.33% of operated fractures in 2019-2021, with pyogenic cocci being the most common infectious agents. The FRI usually developed within 6 months after osteosynthesis. The typical site for the FRI development was the lower limb region, the ongoing FRI was indicated by suggestive clinical criteria (redness, secretion, pain) and radiological criteria (delayed healing and a non-union). Overall, 42.19% of treated non-unions were later diagnosed as FRI. Key words: fracture-related infection, FRI, suggestive criteria, confirmatory criteria, FRI diagnosis, microbial, microbiology spectrum, osteosynthesis, complications, non-union.

摘要

研究目的 本研究旨在确定一级创伤中心三年内骨折相关感染(以下简称FRI)的发生率。研究还旨在确定危险因素,观察符合适用建议的确诊和提示标准,并评估确诊FRI的细菌谱。材料与方法 这是一项通过研究文档进行的回顾性-前瞻性研究。该研究纳入了2019年至2021年期间所有被诊断为FRI并接受治疗的患者,但手部骨折患者除外,因为手指的小指骨骨折大多由门诊治疗,手术室未进行骨固定,且这些患者未在本部门进行随访。结果 2019 - 2021年期间,一级创伤中心所有骨固定手术中FRI发生率为2.33%。FRI最常由化脓性球菌引起,且FRI最常在骨固定术后6个月内发生。风险部位是下肢区域。FRI发生率最常通过提示性临床标准(发红、分泌物、疼痛)和放射学标准(愈合延迟、骨不连)来表明。总体而言,42.19%接受治疗的骨不连患者后来被诊断为FRI。FRI诊断时,21.7%的患者CRP值正常。讨论 2019 - 2021年FRI发生率为2.33%,与其他关注骨固定术后感染并发症发生率的论文报道值相符。Fang和Depypere报道感染并发症发生率为1 - 2%。最常见的危险因素是开放性骨折,在我们的队列中占20.16%。Ktistakis和Depypere描述30%接受治疗的开放性骨折发生骨髓炎。在我们的队列中,下肢骨折的FRI发生率显著更高。Bezstarosti、Wang和Pesch发表了类似结果,但有一些偏差。从骨固定到最终FRI诊断的时间从几周到几年不等。超过一半的患者FRI在骨固定术后6个月内发生。Metsemakers和Fang提到了相同的趋势。研究人群中的CRP水平差异很大。赵兴奇将CRP描述为敏感性较低(敏感性65.6%)但特异性较高(特异性75.4%)的标志物。根据现有文献,引起骨固定感染并发症最常见的病原体是革兰氏阳性球菌,尤其是金黄色葡萄球菌。在我们的研究中,G + 化脓性球菌显然是最常检测到的,这与Fang和Depypere关注感染并发症发生率的研究结果一致。FRI最常见的临床表现包括伤口分泌物、发红、肿胀和疼痛。此外,提示性放射学标准,尤其是愈合延迟和骨不连也表明FRI的发生。根据Fang的说法,感染并发症最常见的临床表现包括疼痛、肿胀、发红和伤口裂开。Fang报道最常见的放射学表现是骨膜反应、植入物松动以及愈合延迟或骨不连,这与我们的队列一致。在我们科室接受手术治疗的骨不连队列中,42.19%的病例随后被确诊为FRI。结论 2019 - 2021年一级创伤中心FRI发生率为手术骨折的2.33%,化脓性球菌是最常见的感染病原体。FRI通常在骨固定术后6个月内发生。FRI发生的典型部位是下肢区域,持续的FRI通过提示性临床标准(发红、分泌物、疼痛)和放射学标准(愈合延迟和骨不连)来表明。总体而言,42.19%接受治疗的骨不连患者后来被诊断为FRI。关键词:骨折相关感染;FRI;提示标准;确诊标准;FRI诊断;微生物;微生物谱;骨固定;并发症;骨不连

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验