Suppr超能文献

全国合作胆结石研究的招募工作。

Recruitment for the National Cooperative Gallstone Study.

作者信息

Croke G

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1979 May;25(5 Pt 2):691-4. doi: 10.1002/cpt1979255part2691.

Abstract

The National Cooperative Gallstone Study (NCGS) recruitment experience is reported, and the factors determining recruitment performance at a center are evaluated. Recruitment performance was grouped into four major areas: coordinating center, protocol, patient population, and treatment center. At the treatment centers, no relationship was found between performance and the prior experience of the clinic staff in clinical trials or expertise in gallstone research, lack of institutional support was not initially apparent, and ancillary studies did not appear to stimulate performance. Neither the population density nor the annual rate of cholecystectomy were predictive of the monthly rate of patient randomization. After the initial biopsy study and in the major study, changes in eligibility criteria and procedural requirements were followed by an augmented randomization rate. No significant correlation was found between the rating given to a center at the time of selection and the subsequent randomization rate. In conclusion, the criteria used by the NCGS for treatment center selection were inadequate to predict subsequent performance.

摘要

本文报告了国家合作胆结石研究(NCGS)的招募经验,并评估了决定中心招募表现的因素。招募表现分为四个主要方面:协调中心、方案、患者群体和治疗中心。在治疗中心,未发现表现与诊所工作人员既往临床试验经验或胆结石研究专业知识之间存在关联,机构支持不足最初并不明显,辅助研究似乎也未促进表现。人口密度和胆囊切除术年率均无法预测患者每月随机分组率。在初始活检研究和主要研究之后,资格标准和程序要求的变化伴随着随机分组率的提高。在选择时给予中心的评分与随后的随机分组率之间未发现显著相关性。总之,NCGS用于治疗中心选择的标准不足以预测后续表现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验