Suppr超能文献

重建、缝合或取下吻合口——在结直肠切除术后吻合口漏的治疗中,哪种手术干预最有效?

Reconstruction, oversewing, or taking the anastomosis down - which surgical intervention is most potent in the treatment of anastomotic leaks following colorectal resections?

机构信息

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Helios Kliniken Schwerin, Wismarsche Straße 393 - 397, 19055, Schwerin, Germany.

Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Benjamin Franklin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 5;408(1):266. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02986-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leak (AL) following colorectal resections can be treated interventionally. However, most cases require surgical intervention. Thus, several surgical techniques are available, which intend to affect the further course positively. The aim of this retrospective analysis is to determine which surgical technique proves to have the biggest potential in reducing the morbidity and mortality as well as to minimize the need of re-interventions after AL.

METHODS

All patients with a history of AL following colorectal resection between 2008 and 2020 were analyzed. Patient's outcomes following surgical treatment of AL, including morbidity and mortality, clinical and para-clinical (laboratory examinations, ultrasound, and CT-scan) detection of AL recurrence, re-intervention rate, and the length of hospital stay were documented and correlated with the surgical technique used (e.g. simply over-sewing the AL, over-sewing the AL with the construction of a protective ileostomy, resection and reconstruction of the anastomosis, peritoneal lavage and transanal drainage, or taking the anastomosis down and constructing an end stoma).

RESULTS

A total of 2,724 colorectal resections were documented. Grade C AL occurred in 92 (4.4% AL occurrence-rate) and 31 (7.2% AL occurrence-rate) cases following colon and rectal resections, respectively. The anastomosis was not preservable in 52 and 17 cases following colon and rectal resections, respectively. Therefore, the anastomosis had been taken down and an end-stoma had been constructed. Over-sewing the AL with the construction of a protective ileostomy had the highest anastomosis preservation rate (14 of 18 cases) and lowest re-intervention rate (mean value of 1.5 re-interventions) following colon and rectal resections (7 of 9 cases; mean value, 1.5 re-interventions).

CONCLUSION

In cases where an AL is preservable, over-sewing the anastomosis and constructing a protective ileostomy has the greatest potential for positive short-term outcomes following colorectal resections.

摘要

目的

结直肠切除术后吻合口漏(AL)可通过介入治疗。然而,大多数情况下需要手术干预。因此,有几种手术技术可用,旨在积极影响后续病程。本回顾性分析的目的是确定哪种手术技术在降低发病率和死亡率方面最有潜力,并最大限度地减少 AL 后再次干预的需求。

方法

分析了 2008 年至 2020 年间所有结直肠切除术后有 AL 病史的患者。记录了 AL 手术后患者的结局,包括发病率和死亡率,AL 复发的临床和辅助(实验室检查、超声和 CT 扫描)检测,再次干预率以及住院时间,并与所用的手术技术相关联(例如,简单地缝合 AL、缝合 AL 并建立保护性回肠造口、切除和重建吻合口、腹腔灌洗和经肛引流,或取下吻合口并建立末端造口)。

结果

共记录了 2724 例结直肠切除术。结肠和直肠切除术后,分别有 92 例(AL 发生率为 4.4%)和 31 例(AL 发生率为 7.2%)发生 C 级 AL。结肠和直肠切除术后分别有 52 例和 17 例吻合不可保留,因此吻合口被切除并建立了末端造口。结肠和直肠切除术后,缝合 AL 并建立保护性回肠造口的吻合口保留率最高(18 例中有 14 例),再次干预率最低(平均值为 1.5 次干预)(9 例中有 7 例,平均值为 1.5 次干预)。

结论

在 AL 可保留的情况下,缝合吻合口并建立保护性回肠造口对结直肠切除术后的短期结局具有最大的积极潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验