Gruenewald Leon David, Koch Vitali, Eichler Katrin, Bauer Jasmin, Gruber-Rouh Tatjana, Booz Christian, Yel Ibrahim, Mahmoudi Scherwin, Vogl Thomas J, El Saman André
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Heliyon. 2023 Jun 21;9(6):e17396. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17396. eCollection 2023 Jun.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To provide a detailed analysis of injury patterns of the spine following blunt trauma and establish the role of supplementary MRI by evaluating discrepancies in the detection rates of damaged structures in CT and MRI. METHOD: 216 patients with blunt trauma to the spine who underwent CT followed by supplementary MRI were included in this study. Two board-certified radiologists blinded to clinical symptoms and injury mechanisms independently interpreted all acquired CT and MRI images. The interpretation was performed using a dedicated catalogue of typical findings associated with spinal trauma and assessed for spinal stability using the AO classification systems. RESULTS: Lesions to structures associated with spinal instability were present in 31.0% in the cervical spine, 12.3% in the thoracic spine, and 29.9% in the lumbar spine. In all spinal segments, MRI provided additional information regarding potentially unstable injuries. Novel information derived from supplementary MRI changed clinical management in 3.6% of patients with injury to the cervical spine. No change in clinical management resulted from novel information on the thoracolumbar spine. Patients with injuries to the vertebral body, intervertebral disc, or spinous process were significantly more likely to benefit from supplementary MRI. CONCLUSION: In patients that sustained blunt spinal trauma, supplementary MRI of the cervical spine should routinely be performed to detect injuries that require surgical treatment, whereas CT is the superior imaging modality for the detection of unstable injuries in the thoracolumbar spine.
原理与目的:通过评估CT和MRI对受损结构的检出率差异,对钝性创伤后脊柱损伤模式进行详细分析,并确定补充MRI的作用。 方法:本研究纳入216例脊柱钝性创伤患者,这些患者先接受了CT检查,随后进行了补充MRI检查。两位对临床症状和损伤机制不知情的获得委员会认证的放射科医生独立解读所有获取的CT和MRI图像。解读使用与脊柱创伤相关的典型发现专用目录进行,并使用AO分类系统评估脊柱稳定性。 结果:与脊柱不稳定相关结构的损伤在颈椎中占31.0%,在胸椎中占12.3%,在腰椎中占29.9%。在所有脊柱节段中,MRI提供了有关潜在不稳定损伤的额外信息。补充MRI获得的新信息改变了3.6%颈椎损伤患者的临床管理。胸腰椎的新信息未导致临床管理改变。椎体、椎间盘或棘突损伤的患者更有可能从补充MRI中获益。 结论:在遭受脊柱钝性创伤的患者中,应常规进行颈椎补充MRI以检测需要手术治疗的损伤,而CT是检测胸腰椎不稳定损伤的更佳影像学检查方法。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014-5
Eur J Radiol. 2022-9
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019-12
Global Spine J. 2022-7
J Spinal Cord Med. 2017-11