Shabestari Alireza Namazi, Tamehri Zadeh Seyed Saeed, Zahmatkesh Parisa, Baghdadabad Leila Zareian, Mirzaei Akram, Mashhadi Rahil, Mesbah Gholamreza, Khajavi Alireza, Akbarzadehmoallemkolaei Milad, Khoshchehreh Mahdi, Rahimnia Ramin, Kazem Aghamir Seyed Mohammad
Department of Geriatric Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Urology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Prostate Int. 2023 Jun;11(2):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes), the alternative to conventional smoking, is increasing considerably worldwide; however, their safety is a matter of debate. Several studies have demonstrated their toxic effects, but no study assessed their effects on the prostate.
The current study aimed at evaluating e-cigarettes and conventional smoking prostate toxicity and effects on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), phosphatase and tensin (PTEN), and prostate transmembrane protein androgen induced 1 (PMEPA1).
30 young Wistar rats were categorized into three groups (n = 10) as follows: the control group, the conventional smoking group, and the e-cigarette group. The case groups were exposed to cigarettes or e-cigarettes for 40 minutes, 3 times a day for four months. Serum parameters, prostate pathology, and gene expression were measured at the end of the intervention. Data were analyzed by Graph Pad prism 9.
Histopathological findings presented that both types of cigarette-induced hyperemia and induced inflammatory cell infiltration and hypertrophy of smooth muscle of the vascular wall in the e-cigarette group. Expression of and genes significantly increased in conventional (2.67-fold; P = 0.0108, 1.80-fold; P = 0.0461 respectively) and e-cigarettes (1.98-fold; P = 0.0127, 1.34-fold; P = 0.938, respectively) groups compared to the control group. Expression of the gene non-significantly decreased in the case of groups compared to the control group.
We found no significant differences between the two groups in terms of PTEN and PMEPA1 expression, whereas VEGFA was significantly more expressed in a conventional smoking group compared to the e-cigarette group. Therefore, it seems that e-cigarettes could not be taken into account as a better option than conventional smoking, and quitting smoking still is the optimal option.
作为传统吸烟的替代品,电子烟在全球范围内的使用量正在大幅增加;然而,其安全性存在争议。多项研究已证明其毒性作用,但尚无研究评估其对前列腺的影响。
本研究旨在评估电子烟和传统吸烟对前列腺的毒性以及对血管内皮生长因子A(VEGFA)、磷酸酶和张力蛋白(PTEN)以及前列腺跨膜蛋白雄激素诱导1(PMEPA1)表达的影响。
将30只年轻的Wistar大鼠分为三组(每组n = 10),如下:对照组、传统吸烟组和电子烟组。病例组每天暴露于香烟或电子烟3次,每次40分钟,持续4个月。在干预结束时测量血清参数、前列腺病理学和基因表达。数据采用Graph Pad prism 9进行分析。
组织病理学结果显示,两种类型的香烟均导致电子烟组出现充血、炎性细胞浸润以及血管壁平滑肌肥大。与对照组相比,传统吸烟组(分别为2.67倍;P = 0.0108,1.80倍;P = 0.0461)和电子烟组(分别为1.98倍;P = 0.0127,1.34倍;P = 0.938)中VEGFA和PTEN基因的表达显著增加。与对照组相比,病例组中PMEPA1基因的表达无显著下降。
我们发现两组在PTEN和PMEPA1表达方面无显著差异,而与电子烟组相比,传统吸烟组中VEGFA的表达显著更高。因此,似乎不能认为电子烟是比传统吸烟更好的选择,戒烟仍然是最佳选择。