Ozmen Tolga, Ozmen Vahit
Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA.
Breast Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Grup Florence Nightingale Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Breast Health. 2023 Jul 3;19(3):186-190. doi: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2023.2023-6-2. eCollection 2023 Jul.
A better understanding of tumor biology and new drugs have led to significant changes in the management of breast cancer (BC). Radical mastectomy, which had been the treatment for BC for more than a century, was based on the hypothesis that BC is a local-regional disease. In the 1970s, Fisher's studies showed that cancer cells could reach the systemic circulation without passage through the regional lymphatic system. Multidisciplinary treatment of BC, which was now considered a systemic disease, was started and radical mastectomy was replaced by breast-conserving surgery (BCS)+, axillary dissection (AD), systemic chemotherapy, hormonotherapy, and radiotherapy in early-stage BC. Modified radical mastectomy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy were applied as a treatment for locally advanced BC. However, later clinical studies demonstrated that the breast can be preserved in those who respond well to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). In the early 1990s, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in early-stage BC (cN0) was performed using blue dye and radioisotope markers. It was shown that AD may be avoided in SLN-negative patients, and SLNB has been a standard intervention in cN0 patients. In this way, the very serious complications of AD, especially lymphedema, were avoided. BC has been shown to be a heterogeneous disease and the tumor may be divided into four different molecular subtypes. Thus, optimal treatment differed from patient to patient (one size fits all was inappropriate), individualized treatments have emerged and over-treatment was avoided. The prolongation of life expectancy and the decrease in recurrence led to an increase in the rate of BCS, an acceptable cosmetic result with oncoplastic surgery, and a better quality of life. The increase in the rate of complete response to NAC with new and targeted agents and especially in human epidermal growth factor receptor-2+ and triple-negative patients with a poor prognosis has led to the use of NAC regardless of cN0. The complete disappearance of the tumor after NAC has been reported by some studies, suggesting that breast surgery may not be needed. However, other studies have shown that vacuum biopsies performed on the tumor bed have a high rate of false negativity. Therefore, it is difficult to suggest that there is no need for lumpectomy, which is cheaper and safer today. The false negativity rate of SLNB is high in patients with cN1 at the time of diagnosis and cN0 after NAC (approximately 13%). In order to reduce this rate to ≤5%, clinical studies have recommended the use of the dual method, marking the positive lymph node before chemotherapy and removing 3-4 nodules with SLN. In summary, a better understanding of tumor biology and new drugs have changed the management of BC and de-escalate the role of surgical treatment.
对肿瘤生物学的深入理解和新药的出现,使得乳腺癌(BC)的治疗发生了重大变化。根治性乳房切除术作为BC的治疗方法已有一个多世纪,其依据是BC是一种局部区域性疾病的假说。20世纪70年代,费希尔的研究表明癌细胞可不通过区域淋巴系统进入体循环。BC现在被认为是一种全身性疾病,于是开始了多学科治疗,早期BC的根治性乳房切除术被保乳手术(BCS)、腋窝淋巴结清扫术(AD)、全身化疗、激素治疗和放疗所取代。改良根治性乳房切除术、化疗和放疗被用于局部晚期BC的治疗。然而,后来的临床研究表明,对新辅助化疗(NAC)反应良好的患者可以保留乳房。20世纪90年代初,在早期BC(cN0)中使用蓝色染料和放射性同位素标记进行前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)。结果显示,前哨淋巴结阴性患者可避免腋窝淋巴结清扫术,SLNB已成为cN0患者的标准干预措施。这样就避免了腋窝淋巴结清扫术的非常严重的并发症,尤其是淋巴水肿。BC已被证明是一种异质性疾病,肿瘤可分为四种不同的分子亚型。因此,最佳治疗方法因人而异(一刀切是不合适的),个体化治疗应运而生,避免了过度治疗。预期寿命的延长和复发率的降低导致保乳手术率增加、肿瘤整形手术获得可接受的美容效果以及生活质量提高。新型靶向药物尤其是对预后较差的人表皮生长因子受体2阳性和三阴性患者新辅助化疗完全缓解率的提高,导致无论cN0情况如何都使用新辅助化疗。一些研究报告了新辅助化疗后肿瘤完全消失,这表明可能不需要乳房手术。然而,其他研究表明,在肿瘤床进行的真空活检假阴性率很高。因此,很难说现在不需要进行费用更低且更安全的肿块切除术。诊断时cN1且新辅助化疗后cN0的患者前哨淋巴结活检假阴性率很高(约13%)。为了将该率降至≤5%,临床研究建议使用双重方法,即在化疗前标记阳性淋巴结并切除3 - 4个前哨淋巴结结节。总之,对肿瘤生物学的更好理解和新药改变了乳腺癌的治疗方式,并降低了手术治疗的作用。