Suppr超能文献

手术和血管内辅助成熟程序可改善动静脉瘘创建后的血管通路建立,但对动静脉移植物置管后的效果不佳。

Surgical and endovascular assisted maturation procedures improve cannulation after arteriovenous fistula creation, but not after arteriovenous graft placement.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2024 Sep;25(5):1649-1658. doi: 10.1177/11297298231185793. Epub 2023 Jul 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

After creation, arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) can undergo surgical or endovascular assisted maturation (AM) procedures to enable use for hemodialysis. We sought to explore the association of interventions with successful two-needle cannulation (TNC) using the United States Renal Data System (USRDS).

METHODS

Using the 2012-2017 USRDS, we identified patients initiating hemodialysis with tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC). Successful AVF/G use was defined as two-needle cannulation (TNC). Our principal outcome was time to first TNC after AVF/G creation. Death and new access placement were competing events that precluded TNC. Competing-risks regression models were constructed to identify factors associated with cannulation. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between AM procedures and 1-year TNC and also to compare post-cannulation outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 81,143 patients, 15,880 (19.6%) had AVG and 65,263 (80.4%) had AVF. AVG patients were more likely than AVF patients to achieve TNC at 1 year on unadjusted (77.4% vs 64.0%,  < 0.001) and on multivariate analysis (sHR = 2.56 (2.49-2.63),  < 0.001). For AVFs, one AM surgical procedure was associated with improved 1-year TNC rates, but further revisions were not helpful. Endovascular AM procedures were associated with increased AVF TNC rates. Any procedure, surgical or endovascular, was detrimental to achieving TNC for AVGs.Following initial TNC, those accesses that needed AM procedures were associated with higher rates of access failure (AVF: OR = 1.32 (1.21-1.45); AVG: OR = 1.77 (1.500-2.00);  < 0.001), catheter replacement (AVF: OR = 1.27 (1.20-1.34); AVG: OR = 1.56 (1.42-1.71),  < 0.001), and additional endovascular procedures (AVF: 0.75 ± 1.22 no AM vs 1.33 ± 1.62 any AM; AVG: 1.31 ± 1.77 no AM vs 1.96 ± 2.22 any AM; all  < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

AVG achieved TNC after creation more reliably than AVF. A single surgery or endovascular procedures for AVFs is associated with greater rates of TNC. For AVGs, any AM procedure is associated with lower cannulation rates, and reinforces the need for careful operative technique.

摘要

目的

动静脉瘘(AVF)和动静脉移植物(AVG)在创建后可以进行手术或血管内辅助成熟(AM)程序,以使其可用于血液透析。我们旨在利用美国肾脏数据系统(USRDS)探讨干预措施与成功的双针穿刺(TNC)之间的关联。

方法

使用 2012-2017 年 USRDS,我们确定了开始使用隧道透析导管(TDC)进行血液透析的患者。成功使用 AVF/G 的定义为双针穿刺(TNC)。我们的主要结局是 AVF/G 创建后首次 TNC 的时间。死亡和新通路的建立是妨碍 TNC 的竞争事件。建立竞争风险回归模型以确定与穿刺相关的因素。使用逻辑回归评估 AM 程序与 1 年 TNC 的关联,并比较穿刺后的结果。

结果

在 81143 名患者中,有 15880 名(19.6%)患有 AVG,65263 名(80.4%)患有 AVF。在未调整(77.4%对 64.0%,  < 0.001)和多变量分析(sHR=2.56(2.49-2.63),  < 0.001)时,与 AVF 患者相比,AVG 患者更有可能在 1 年内实现 TNC。对于 AVFs,单次 AM 手术与提高 1 年 TNC 率相关,但进一步修订并无帮助。血管内 AM 手术与增加 AVF TNC 率相关。任何手术或血管内手术都不利于 AVG 实现 TNC。在初次 TNC 后,需要 AM 手术的通路与更高的通路失败率相关(AVF:OR=1.32(1.21-1.45);AVG:OR=1.77(1.500-2.00);  < 0.001)、导管更换(AVF:OR=1.27(1.20-1.34);AVG:OR=1.56(1.42-1.71);  < 0.001)和额外的血管内手术(AVF:0.75±1.22 无 AM 与 1.33±1.62 有 AM;AVG:1.31±1.77 无 AM 与 1.96±2.22 有 AM;均  < 0.001)。

结论

与 AVF 相比,AVG 更可靠地实现了 TNC。AVF 的单次手术或血管内手术与更高的 TNC 率相关。对于 AVG,任何 AM 手术均与较低的穿刺率相关,并进一步强调需要谨慎的手术技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验