Suppr超能文献

心理健康专业人员视角下影响客户互动中数字工具使用的因素:访谈研究

Factors Affecting Digital Tool Use in Client Interaction According to Mental Health Professionals: Interview Study.

作者信息

Lukka Lauri, Karhulahti Veli-Matti, Palva J Matias

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.

出版信息

JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jul 10;10:e44681. doi: 10.2196/44681.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital tools and interventions are being increasingly developed in response to the growing mental health crisis, and mental health professionals (MHPs) considerably influence their adoption in client practice. However, how MHPs use digital tools in client interaction is yet to be sufficiently understood, which poses challenges to their design, development, and implementation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to create a contextual understanding of how MHPs use different digital tools in clinical client practice and what characterizes the use across tools.

METHODS

A total of 19 Finnish MHPs participated in semistructured interviews, and the data were transcribed, coded, and inductively analyzed.

RESULTS

We found that MHP digital tool use was characterized by 3 distinct functions: communication, diagnosis and evaluation, and facilitating therapeutic change. The functions were addressed using analog tools, digitized tools that mimic their analog counterparts, and digital tools that use the possibilities native to digital. The MHP-client communication included various media alongside face-to-face meetings, the MHPs increasingly used digitized tools in client evaluation, and the MHPs actively used digitized materials to facilitate therapeutic change. MHP tool use was generally characterized by adaptability-it was negotiated in client interactions. However, there was considerable variance in the breadth of MHPs' digital toolbox. The existing clinical practices emphasized MHP-client interaction and invited incremental rather than radical developments, which challenged the achievement of the scalability benefits expected from digital tools.

CONCLUSIONS

MHPs use digitized and digital tools in client practice. Our results contribute to the user-centered research, development, and implementation of new digital solutions in mental health care by classifying them according to their function and medium and describing how MHPs use and do not use them.

摘要

背景

随着心理健康危机的日益加剧,数字工具和干预措施正在不断开发,心理健康专业人员(MHP)在客户实践中对这些工具的采用有很大影响。然而,MHP在与客户互动中如何使用数字工具尚未得到充分理解,这对其设计、开发和实施构成了挑战。

目的

本研究旨在深入了解MHP在临床客户实践中如何使用不同的数字工具以及跨工具使用的特点。

方法

共有19名芬兰MHP参与了半结构化访谈,对数据进行了转录、编码和归纳分析。

结果

我们发现MHP使用数字工具具有3种不同功能:沟通、诊断与评估以及促进治疗改变。这些功能通过模拟工具、模仿模拟工具的数字化工具以及利用数字原生可能性的数字工具来实现。MHP与客户的沟通除面对面会议外还包括各种媒介,MHP在客户评估中越来越多地使用数字化工具,并且MHP积极使用数字化材料来促进治疗改变。MHP使用工具的特点通常是适应性——在与客户的互动中进行协商。然而,MHP数字工具库的广度存在很大差异。现有的临床实践强调MHP与客户的互动,并倾向于渐进式而非激进式的发展,这对实现数字工具预期的可扩展性效益构成了挑战。

结论

MHP在客户实践中使用数字化和数字工具。我们的研究结果通过根据功能和媒介对新数字解决方案进行分类,并描述MHP如何使用以及不使用这些方案,为以用户为中心的心理健康护理新数字解决方案的研究、开发和实施做出了贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e634/10366964/f42d8d6346a2/humanfactors_v10i1e44681_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验