Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
J Urol. 2023 Oct;210(4):639-648. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003618. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
We assessed the prognostic significance of quantification of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy.
We quantified actual perineural invasion foci in the entire prostate biopsy specimens from 724 patients and compared corresponding radical prostatectomy findings and long-term oncologic outcomes.
No perineural invasion was detected in 524 (72.4%) prostate biopsies, whereas 1 (n=129; 17.8%), 2 (n=40; 5.5%), 3 (n=18; 2.5%), 4 (n=7; 1.0%), and 5-10 (n=6; 0.8%) perineural invasion foci were present in other cases. We confirmed a higher risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with perineural invasion on prostate biopsy than in those with no perineural invasion ( < .001). Remarkably, recurrence-free survival was comparable between those with 0 vs 1 perineural invasion ( = .9) or 2 vs ≥3 perineural invasions ( = .3). Nonetheless, multifocal perineural invasion per prostate biopsy (vs single perineural invasion; < .001) and >1 perineural invasion per 10-mm tumor (vs ≤1 perineural invasion; = .008) were associated with worse outcomes. Interestingly, in a subgroup outcome analysis of single vs multifocal perineural invasions per prostate biopsy, there was a significant difference in patients showing perineural invasion involving only 1 of the sextant sites. In multivariable analysis, both multifocal perineural invasion/case (HR=5.48, < .001) and >1 perineural invasion/10-mm tumor (HR=3.96, < .001) showed significance for recurrence. Meanwhile, compared with CAPRA (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) score alone (0.687/0.685), Harrell's C index/AUC for predicting 5-year recurrence-free survival was gradually increased when 1 (0.722/0.740), 2 (0.747/0.773), or 3 (0.760/0.792) point(s) were additionally assigned to multifocal perineural invasion.
Multifocal perineural invasion and >1 perineural invasion per 10-mm tumor on each prostate biopsy were thus found to be associated with poorer prognosis, as independent predictors, in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
我们评估了前列腺活检中神经周围侵犯量化的预后意义。
我们在 724 例患者的整个前列腺活检标本中定量了实际的神经周围侵犯灶,并比较了相应的根治性前列腺切除术结果和长期肿瘤学结果。
524 例(72.4%)前列腺活检中未检测到神经周围侵犯,而 1 例(n=129;17.8%)、2 例(n=40;5.5%)、3 例(n=18;2.5%)、4 例(n=7;1.0%)和 5-10 例(n=6;0.8%)存在其他神经周围侵犯灶。我们证实,与无神经周围侵犯的患者相比,前列腺活检中有神经周围侵犯的患者在根治性前列腺切除术后复发的风险更高(<0.001)。值得注意的是,在有 0 个 vs 1 个神经周围侵犯(=0.9)或 2 个 vs ≥3 个神经周围侵犯(=0.3)的患者之间,无复发生存率相当。然而,前列腺活检中多灶性神经周围侵犯(vs 单灶性神经周围侵犯;<0.001)和每 10mm 肿瘤>1 个神经周围侵犯(vs ≤1 个神经周围侵犯;=0.008)与较差的结果相关。有趣的是,在前列腺活检中单灶 vs 多灶性神经周围侵犯的亚组结果分析中,仅在神经周围侵犯累及 1 个 sextant 部位的患者中存在显著差异。在多变量分析中,多灶性神经周围侵犯/例(HR=5.48,<0.001)和每 10mm 肿瘤>1 个神经周围侵犯(HR=3.96,<0.001)均显示出与复发的相关性。同时,与 CAPRA(前列腺癌风险评估)评分(0.687/0.685)相比,当在多灶性神经周围侵犯中分别增加 1 个(0.722/0.740)、2 个(0.747/0.773)或 3 个(0.760/0.792)点时,Harrell 的 C 指数/AUC 用于预测 5 年无复发生存率逐渐增加。
多灶性神经周围侵犯和每 10mm 肿瘤>1 个神经周围侵犯被发现是独立的预测因子,与接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌男性的预后较差相关。