Suppr超能文献

鞘内导管的位置和管理对意外硬脊膜穿刺后头痛发生率和严重程度的影响:一项回顾性真实世界研究。

The effect of placement and management of intrathecal catheters following accidental dural puncture on the incidence of postdural puncture headache and severity: a retrospective real-world study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Soroka University Medical Center and the Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Department of Anaesthesia, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center Associated with Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2023 Oct;78(10):1256-1261. doi: 10.1111/anae.16088. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

Abstract

Accidental dural puncture during an attempt to establish labour epidural analgesia can result in postdural puncture headache and long-term debilitating conditions. Epidural blood patch, the gold standard treatment for this headache, is invasive and not always successful. Inserting an intrathecal catheter after accidental dural puncture may prevent postdural puncture headache. We evaluated the effect of intrathecal catheter insertion on the incidence of postdural puncture headache and the need for epidural blood patch and whether duration of intrathecal catheterisation or injection of intrathecal saline affected outcome. Our retrospective study was conducted at two tertiary, university-affiliated medical centres between 2017 and 2022 and included 92,651 epidurals and 550 cases of accidental dural puncture (0.59%); 219 parturients (39.8%) received an intrathecal catheter and 331 (60.2%) a resited epidural. Use of an intrathecal catheter versus resiting the epidural did not decrease the odds of postdural puncture headache, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) (95%CI) 0.91 (0.81-1.01), but was associated with a lower need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.82 (0.73-0.91), p < 0.001). We found no benefit in leaving in the intrathecal catheter for 24 h postpartum (postdural puncture headache, aOR (95%CI) 1.01 (1.00-1.02), p = 0.015; epidural blood patch, aOR (95%CI) 1.00 (0.99-1.01), p = 0.40). We found an added benefit of injecting intrathecal saline as it decreased the incidence of postdural puncture headache (aOR (95%CI) 0.85 (0.73-0.99), p = 0.04) and the need for epidural blood patch (aOR (95%CI) 0.75 (0.64-0.87), p < 0.001). Our study confirms the benefits of intrathecal catheterisation and provides guidance on how to best manage an intrathecal catheter.

摘要

在尝试建立分娩硬膜外镇痛时意外刺破硬脑膜可导致穿刺后头痛和长期虚弱的情况。硬膜外血补丁是治疗这种头痛的金标准,但具有侵入性且并不总是成功。在意外刺破硬脑膜后插入鞘内导管可能会预防穿刺后头痛。我们评估了鞘内导管插入对穿刺后头痛的发生率和对硬膜外血补丁的需求的影响,以及鞘内导管插入的持续时间或鞘内生理盐水注射是否会影响结果。我们的回顾性研究在 2017 年至 2022 年间在两个三级大学附属医院进行,共包括 92651 例硬膜外麻醉和 550 例意外刺破硬脑膜(0.59%);219 名产妇(39.8%)接受了鞘内导管,331 名(60.2%)重新放置了硬膜外导管。与重新放置硬膜外导管相比,使用鞘内导管并没有降低穿刺后头痛的几率,调整后的优势比(95%CI)为 0.91(0.81-1.01),但与对硬膜外血补丁的需求降低相关(调整后的优势比(95%CI)为 0.82(0.73-0.91),p<0.001)。我们没有发现将鞘内导管保留在体内 24 小时产后(穿刺后头痛,调整后的优势比(95%CI)为 1.01(1.00-1.02),p=0.015;硬膜外血补丁,调整后的优势比(95%CI)为 1.00(0.99-1.01),p=0.40)的获益。我们发现鞘内注射生理盐水有额外的获益,因为它降低了穿刺后头痛的发生率(调整后的优势比(95%CI)为 0.85(0.73-0.99),p=0.04)和对硬膜外血补丁的需求(调整后的优势比(95%CI)为 0.75(0.64-0.87),p<0.001)。我们的研究证实了鞘内导管插入的益处,并提供了关于如何最好地管理鞘内导管的指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验