Department of Psychology, Florida State University.
Neuropsychology. 2023 Nov;37(8):859-871. doi: 10.1037/neu0000918. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
The current randomized controlled trial (RCT) was the first to examine the benefits of central executive training (CET, which trains the components of working memory [WM]) for reducing organizational skills difficulties relative to a carefully matched neurocognitive training intervention (inhibitory control training [ICT]).
A carefully phenotyped sample of 73 children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity-impulsivity disorder (ADHD; ages 8-13, = 10.15, = 1.43; 20 girls; 73% White/Non-Hispanic) participated in a preregistered RCT of CET versus ICT (both 10-week treatments). Parent-rated task planning, organized actions, and memory/materials management data were collected at pretreatment, posttreatment, and 2-4 month follow-up; teacher ratings were obtained at pretreatment and 1-2 month follow-up.
CET was superior to ICT for improving organizational skills based on teacher report (Treatment × Time interaction: = 0.61, = .01, BF₁₀ = 31.61). The CET group also improved significantly based on parent report, but this improvement was equivalent in both groups (main effect of time: = 0.48, < .001, BF₁₀ = 3.13 × 10⁷; Treatment × Time interaction: = 0.29, = .25, BF₀₁ = 3.73). Post hocs/preregistered planned contrasts indicated that CET produced significant and clinically meaningful (number needed to treat = 3-8) pre/post gains on all three parent (d = 0.50 -0.62) and all three teacher ( = 0.46 -0.95) subscales, with gains that were maintained at 1-2 month (teacher report) and 2-4 month follow-up (parent report) for five of six outcomes.
Results provide strong initial evidence that CET produces robust and lasting downstream improvements in school-based organizational skills for children with ADHD based on teacher report. These findings are generally consistent with model-driven predictions that ADHD-related organizational problems are secondary outcomes caused, at least in part, by underdeveloped working memory abilities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
本随机对照试验(RCT)首次考察了中央执行功能训练(CET,训练工作记忆[WM]的组成部分)相对于精心匹配的神经认知训练干预(抑制控制训练[ICT])对减少组织技能困难的益处。
一个精心表型的 73 名注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD;年龄 8-13 岁,M = 10.15,SD = 1.43;20 名女孩;73%为白种人/非西班牙裔)儿童样本参与了 CET 与 ICT(均为 10 周治疗)的预先注册 RCT。在治疗前、治疗后和 2-4 个月随访时收集了父母评定的任务规划、组织动作和记忆/材料管理数据;在治疗前和 1-2 个月随访时获得了教师评定。
基于教师报告,CET 优于 ICT,改善组织技能(治疗×时间交互作用:F(1,71)= 0.61,p =.01,BF₁₀ = 31.61)。CET 组在父母报告中也有显著改善,但两组之间的改善相当(时间的主要效应:F(1,71)= 0.48,p <.001,BF₁₀ = 3.13×10⁷;治疗×时间交互作用:F(1,71)= 0.29,p =.25,BF₀₁ = 3.73)。事后分析/预先注册的计划对比表明,CET 在所有三项父母(d = 0.50-0.62)和所有三项教师(d = 0.46-0.95)子量表上均产生了显著且具有临床意义的(需要治疗的人数 = 3-8)治疗前/后增益,在六项结果中的五项中,增益在 1-2 个月(教师报告)和 2-4 个月随访(父母报告)时得到维持。
结果提供了强有力的初步证据,表明 CET 为 ADHD 儿童提供了基于教师报告的学校组织技能的强大且持久的下游改善。这些发现通常与模型驱动的预测一致,即 ADHD 相关的组织问题是次要结果,至少部分原因是工作记忆能力发育不全。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。